Skip to main content

The automotive market place is ever-changing with consumer tastes, and the current generation of vehicles are more advanced than ever. Computer technology has changed the way that we drive for the better, and the new crop of cars are implementing it more than ever. However, that doesn’t mean there aren’t several new cars drivers should avoid.

Unfortunately, there are also new cars that have been rushed and are oftentimes outdated relics from a previous generation. Drivers also have the new batch of crossovers that are making their way onto the market. We are going to be taking a look at 40 new cars that are best left avoided according to Consumer Reports.

40. Ford SVT Raptor

SVT Raptor
via: Ford

The Ford Raptor has been a sales success for the automaker, incorporating everything that made the Lightning a great truck and adding off-road prowess to it. But the Raptor has also had its fair share of reliability issues, making it a truck to potentially avoid for the consumers who purchased these trucks. The Raptor has been recalled for issues that pertain to a faulty timing chain, and this problem happens well under the 100k mileage market. This also means the problem is not covered by the warranty and thus the truck is rendered useless. It’s become one to avoid without a doubt.

Raptor
via: Ford

Being that the Raptor is one of the most expensive pickup trucks on the market, this represents a real problem. Consumers have been lodging complaints against Ford to no avail. When you spend this amount of money on a truck, you want it to be reliable. If you’re in the market for a performance pickup truck the Raptor is a car to avoid, as the pitfalls of reliability are just too much.

Source

For decades, the Ford Mustang and Chevrolet Camaro have battled for muscle car supremacy. From drag strips to daily streets, these pony cars define American performance. With power, style, and fierce fan loyalty, their rivalry remains legendary. In this showdown, we compare history, performance, design, and culture to declare a winner.

The Birth of the Pony Car War: 1964.5 Mustang vs. 1967 Camaro

Barrett Jackson

Ford launched the Mustang in 1964, creating an entirely new market for stylish, performance-driven cars. Its immediate popularity forced Chevrolet to respond in 1967 with the Camaro, a direct competitor. This rivalry quickly intensified, driving innovation and performance advancements that would forever shape the landscape of American muscle cars.

Why Ford Beat Chevy to the Punch: Mustang’s Early Dominance

Hot Rod

Ford made the Mustang in 1964. It was a small, fast car that people loved right away. It sold well before Chevy made the Camaro in 1967. By then, Mustang was already popular, and many people had bought one. This gave Ford a big lead in the pony car race.

Chevy’s Response: How the Camaro Was Built to Take on Mustang

Hot Rod

Chevy saw how well the Mustang was selling and knew they needed a rival. In 1967, they made the Camaro, a fast and stylish car built to compete. It had strong engines and a sporty look. Though Mustang had a head start, Camaro quickly became a favorite among car fans.

The 1969 Camaro Z/28 vs. Boss 302 Mustang: Track-Ready Legends

BAT

The 1969 Camaro Z/28 and Boss 302 Mustang were built for the track. The Z/28 had a high-revving 302 V8 and sharp handling, making it a Trans-Am favorite. The Boss 302 was Ford’s answer, blending power and agility. Both became legends, proving their strength in one of racing’s greatest rivalries.

Mustang’s Mach 1 vs. Camaro’s SS: Which Had the Better Muscle?

BAT

The Mustang Mach 1 and Camaro SS were made for speed. The Mach 1 had strong V8 engines and a bold look. The Camaro SS brought big power and sharp styling. Both cars were fast and exciting, making people argue for years about which one was the true muscle car king.

First-Gen Styling: Which Classic Look Stood the Test of Time?

BAT

The first Mustang and Camaro had unique looks that made them stand out. The Mustang was sleek and sporty, while the Camaro had a tougher style. Both cars still turn heads today. Their designs have lasted for decades, showing why they remain two of the most popular classic cars ever.

The 1970s Struggle: Emissions and the Death of Muscle Power

BAT

In the 1970s, new rules changed cars. Emissions laws made engines weaker, and gas prices went up. Muscle cars like the Mustang and Camaro lost power. People wanted smaller, fuel-efficient cars instead. It was a tough time, but these classics survived, waiting for the return of high-performance years later.

The Return of Performance: Fox-Body Mustangs vs. 3rd-Gen Camaros

Cars & Bids

In the 1980s, muscle cars made a comeback. The Fox-body Mustang was light and quick, with strong V8 options. The 3rd-gen Camaro had sharp styling and better handling. Both brought performance back after years of slow cars. This era helped revive the Mustang vs. Camaro rivalry for a new generation.

The 1990s Rebirth: SN95 Mustang vs. 4th-Gen Camaro

Car and Driver

In the 1990s, muscle cars got faster again. The SN95 Mustang had a new design and a strong V8. The 4th-gen Camaro came with more power and sharp looks. Both cars brought excitement back to the streets, making the Mustang vs. Camaro rivalry stronger than ever for a new era.

Modern Muscle: 2010+ Mustang vs. Camaro – The Retro Comeback

GM

In 2010, muscle cars went back to their roots. The Mustang got a bold, retro look with strong V8 power. The Camaro returned with aggressive styling and big performance. Both brought back the classic rivalry, mixing old-school muscle with modern tech, proving that pony cars were here to stay.

Small Block vs. Big Block: Who Built the Better Powerplant?

Cars & Bids

Small block engines are light and quick, giving cars better handling. Big block engines are heavier but have more power for straight-line speed. Both the Mustang and Camaro used them in different ways. Some drivers prefer high-revving small blocks, while others love the raw strength of a big block motor.

The Best-Sounding V8: Mustang Coyote vs. Camaro LT1

GM

The Mustang’s Coyote V8 has a high-revving roar, while the Camaro’s LT1 delivers a deep, aggressive rumble. Both sound incredible, but they have different tones. Some prefer the sharp scream of the Coyote, while others love the LT1’s classic muscle car growl. Either way, both engines turn heads.

Quarter-Mile Showdown: Which Car Ruled the Drag Strip?

Car & Driver

The Mustang and Camaro have been racing for years. The Mustang is quick off the line, while the Camaro has strong power for high speeds. Both have won drag races, and fans still argue over which one is faster. No matter the winner, both cars are built for pure speed.

Handling Matters: Mustang’s Independent Rear vs. Camaro’s IRS

Car & Driver

The Mustang and Camaro use different suspension setups for handling. Older Mustangs had a solid rear axle, making them great for drag racing but tough on corners. The Camaro’s IRS gave it better grip and control. Today, both cars use IRS, making them faster and smoother on winding roads.

Turbo vs. V8: Camaro 2.0T vs. Mustang EcoBoost

Car & Driver

The Camaro 2.0T and Mustang EcoBoost bring turbo power to the pony car world. The Mustang’s EcoBoost is quick and fuel-efficient, while the Camaro’s 2.0T offers sharp handling and balance. Both provide strong performance without a V8, making them great options for drivers who want speed with better mileage.

Supercharged Beasts: GT500 vs. ZL1 – Who Owns the Streets?

Car & Driver

The Mustang GT500 and Camaro ZL1 are built for pure speed. The GT500 packs a supercharged V8 with brutal acceleration, while the ZL1 delivers raw power with sharp handling. Both dominate the streets and the track, leaving fans debating which one is the true king of modern muscle.

Track Champion: Shelby GT350 vs. Camaro SS 1LE

Car & Driver

The Shelby GT350 and Camaro SS 1LE were made for the track. The GT350’s high-revving V8 and sharp steering make it a corner-carving machine. The SS 1LE brings balanced handling and strong V8 power. Both deliver thrilling performance, leaving drivers debating which one is the ultimate track champion.

Which Pony Car Brakes Better? Stopping Power Comparison

Ford

Braking is just as important as speed. The Mustang and Camaro both offer strong braking systems, but performance varies by model. The GT500 and ZL1 have big Brembo brakes for quick stops, while base models rely on smaller setups. On the track, both deliver solid stopping power, but results vary.

6-Speed vs. 10-Speed: Transmission Wars

Ford

The Mustang and Camaro come with two transmission options. The 6-speed manual gives a hands-on driving feel, while the 10-speed automatic shifts fast for better speed. Some drivers love the control of a manual, while others prefer the smooth and quick shifts of an automatic for daily driving.

Gas Guzzler or Efficiency King? Fuel Economy Face-Off

Ford

The Mustang and Camaro are built for speed, but fuel economy matters too. The V8 models use more gas, giving raw power but lower miles per gallon. The turbocharged versions offer better efficiency while still being quick. Drivers must choose between muscle car performance or saving fuel on daily drives.

Who Had the More Aggressive Stance? Camaro vs. Mustang Styling

Hot Rod

The Mustang and Camaro have bold designs, but their looks are different. The Mustang has a sleek, classic shape with sharp lines. The Camaro sits lower and wider, giving it a more aggressive stance. Both cars turn heads, but some prefer the Mustang’s heritage, while others love the Camaro’s tough style.

Retro vs. Modern: Which Design Evolution Did It Best?

GM

The Mustang and Camaro have changed over the years, blending old-school style with modern performance. The Mustang keeps its classic shape with modern touches, staying true to its roots. The Camaro has a more aggressive, futuristic look. Both balance heritage and innovation, but fans debate which evolution captures the best design.

Convertible Showdown: Camaro Drop-Top vs. Mustang Ragtop

Hot Rod

The Camaro and Mustang both offer convertible models for open-air driving. The Mustang convertible keeps its classic style and smooth ride, making it great for cruising. The Camaro drop-top has a lower stance and sportier handling. Both deliver fun in the sun, but drivers debate which one feels better topless.

Cockpit Wars: Interior Comfort and Tech Over the Years

Hot Rod

The Mustang and Camaro have evolved inside as much as under the hood. The Mustang’s interior focuses on comfort with a classic layout and modern tech. The Camaro’s cockpit feels sportier, with a lower seating position and driver-focused design. Both have improved over the years, but preferences come down to style and usability.

Infotainment Battle: Ford Sync vs. Chevy MyLink

Motor Trend

The Mustang and Camaro offer advanced infotainment systems to keep drivers connected. Ford Sync is user-friendly, with voice control and smartphone integration. Chevy MyLink provides a responsive touchscreen and easy navigation. Both systems support Apple CarPlay and Android Auto, but drivers debate which one delivers the best tech experience on the road.

Which One Feels More Like a Sports Car? Driving Experience Breakdown

Barrett Jackson

The Mustang and Camaro both bring muscle car power, but their driving feel is different. The Camaro sits lower, with tighter handling and a cockpit-like interior, making it feel more like a sports car. The Mustang offers a smoother ride with a classic muscle car feel. Drivers debate which experience is better.

Better Seats for the Road Trip: Mustang or Camaro?

Ford

Long drives need comfortable seats, and the Mustang and Camaro offer different experiences. The Mustang’s seats are more spacious with better visibility, making road trips easier. The Camaro’s seats are sporty and supportive, but the low roof and smaller windows can feel tight. For comfort, many prefer the Mustang’s open feel.

Trunk Space Battle: Which Pony Car is More Practical?

Cars and Bids

Storage matters, even in muscle cars. The Mustang has a larger trunk and a wider opening, making it easier to load luggage. The Camaro’s trunk is smaller with a narrow opening, limiting space for bigger items. While both are built for performance, the Mustang is the more practical choice for cargo.

The Rear Seat Dilemma: Mustang or Camaro for Passengers?

Cars and Bids

Rear seats in pony cars are tight, but some are better than others. The Mustang offers slightly more legroom and easier access, making it the better choice for passengers. The Camaro’s rear seats feel cramped due to its low roof and small windows. Neither is ideal, but the Mustang wins for comfort.

Material Quality: Who Used the Better Build Materials?

GM

The Mustang and Camaro have improved their interiors over the years, but differences remain. The Mustang uses softer materials and a more refined layout, giving it a premium feel. The Camaro focuses on a sportier design but has more hard plastics. While both have stepped up quality, the Mustang feels more upscale.

Movie Star Cars: Bullitt Mustang vs. Transformers Bumblebee Camaro

Ford

The Mustang and Camaro have starred in Hollywood blockbusters, becoming legends on the big screen. The Bullitt Mustang, with its dark green paint and roaring V8, became iconic in Steve McQueen’s high-speed chase. The Bumblebee Camaro brought muscle car excitement to Transformers fans. Both are unforgettable, but which one is more legendary?

Which One Had the Better Ad Campaigns? Marketing Face-Off

IMDB

Ford and Chevy have battled not just on the road, but in advertising too. The Mustang’s ads focused on freedom, adventure, and classic American muscle. The Camaro’s marketing leaned into aggression, speed, and rebellion. Both created lasting impressions, but fans debate which campaign made the biggest impact over the years.

Muscle Car of the People: Which One Had a Bigger Fan Base?

BAT

The Mustang and Camaro both have loyal followings, but their fan bases differ. The Mustang has been in continuous production since 1964, building a massive global audience. The Camaro, despite its breaks in production, has die-hard supporters who love its aggressive style. Both cars have strong communities, but Mustang’s reach is wider.

Drag Racing Culture: Mustang Clubs vs. Camaro Clubs

BAT

Mustang and Camaro fans love racing. Mustang clubs bring big groups together for fun events. Camaro clubs focus on serious competition. Both sides work on their cars to go faster. The rivalry makes drag racing exciting, with drivers always trying to beat the other and set better times on the track.

Which One is the Favorite of Celebrities? Famous Owners

BAT

Many famous people own muscle cars. The Mustang has been driven by Steve McQueen and Jay Leno, known for its classic style. The Camaro is a favorite of Kevin Hart and Sylvester Stallone, who love its bold look. Both cars have star power, making them popular in Hollywood and beyond.

Who Owned the 1980s? Fox-Body vs. IROC-Z Popularity

BAT

The Fox-body Mustang and IROC-Z Camaro were two of the most popular cars of the 1980s. The Mustang was lightweight, quick, and easy to upgrade, making it a favorite for racers. The IROC-Z had bold styling and great handling. Both were icons, but fans still argue over which one ruled the decade.

Which Car Has More Street Cred? Mustang or Camaro?

BAT

The Mustang and Camaro both have strong street reputations. The Mustang is known for its long history, powerful engines, and wide fan base. The Camaro has a bold, aggressive style that gives it a tougher image. Both cars are respected, but fans still debate which one has the most street cred.

Video Game Icons: Mustang vs. Camaro in Racing Games

IGN

The Mustang and Camaro have been featured in many racing games over the years. The Mustang is a favorite in classics like Need for Speed and Gran Turismo, known for its speed and style. The Camaro brings raw power to games like Forza and Midnight Club. Both cars are gaming legends.

The Tuner Scene: Which Car is More Mod-Friendly?

Hot Rod

The Mustang and Camaro are both great for car mods. The Mustang has a huge selection of parts, making upgrades easy. The Camaro has strong engine power but can be harder to modify. Both cars can be tuned for better speed and style, keeping the debate going among car fans.

Car Show Kings: Which One Wins More Awards?

Hot Rod

The Mustang and Camaro both get attention at car shows. The Mustang is known for its classic models and unique designs. The Camaro stands out with bold styling and high-performance builds. Both have won many awards, but fans still debate which one is the real star of the show.

Which Car Holds Its Value Better? Resale Value Face-Off

GM

The Mustang and Camaro both have strong resale value, but the Mustang tends to hold its worth better over time. Its long production history and high demand keep prices steady. The Camaro can also retain value, especially special editions, but its resale varies more. Both are great investments for muscle car fans.

Reliability Wars: Mustang vs. Camaro in Long-Term Durability

GM

The Mustang and Camaro are built to last, but some hold up better over time. The Mustang is known for strong engines and fewer major issues. The Camaro is reliable too, but some models have had problems with electronics. Both can last with good care, keeping their rivalry going for years.

Which One is Cheaper to Maintain? Parts & Service Costs

Rich Mccoy

The Mustang and Camaro both need maintenance, but the Mustang is usually cheaper. Its parts are easy to find and cost less. The Camaro can be more expensive, especially for repairs on high-performance models. Both cars require care, but the Mustang is often the better option for keeping costs low.

Who Handles Better in Bad Weather? Traction & Stability Battle

GM

The Mustang and Camaro are built for speed, but handling in bad weather matters too. The Mustang has better visibility and a balanced weight distribution, making it easier to control. The Camaro has good traction but can feel harder to handle in rain or snow. Both need caution, but the Mustang wins here.

Electrification Wars: Will the Mustang Mach-E or an Electric Camaro Win?

Ford

Ford has already entered the electric market with the Mustang Mach-E, offering speed and practicality. Chevy has yet to release an electric Camaro, but rumors suggest one is coming. The Mach-E is popular, but Camaro fans hope for a true electric muscle car. The battle for the future is just beginning.

Collector’s Choice: Which Classic Models Fetch Higher Prices?

Hot Rod

Classic Mustang and Camaro models are highly valued by collectors. The Shelby GT500 and Boss 429 Mustangs often sell for top dollar. Rare Camaro models, like the COPO 427 and ZL1, also bring high prices. Both are sought after, but Mustangs generally have a stronger resale value over time.

Drag Strip or Road Course: Who is the True Performance King?

GM

The Mustang and Camaro shine in different areas. On the drag strip, the Mustang’s strong launches and straight-line speed give it an edge. On a road course, the Camaro’s low stance and sharp handling make it a contender. Both are built for performance, but the winner depends on the track.

Daily Driver Showdown: Camaro or Mustang for Everyday Use?

BAT

The Mustang and Camaro both work as daily drivers, but they offer different experiences. The Mustang has better visibility, a smoother ride, and more trunk space, making it more practical. The Camaro has a sportier feel but a tighter cabin and limited visibility. For everyday comfort, the Mustang is the better choice.

Pony Cars: Who Left the Bigger Mark on Automotive History?

Car and Driver

The Mustang and Camaro both have left lasting marks on automotive history. The Mustang, introduced in 1964, defined the pony car segment and became a symbol of American performance. The Camaro, launched in 1967, gave Chevy fans a rival that shaped muscle car culture. While both are legends, the Mustang’s earlier debut gives it a slight edge in legacy.

The Final Verdict: Which Pony Car Wins the Ultimate Showdown?

Ford

The Mustang and Camaro have both been around for a long time. The Mustang is loved for its classic look, while the Camaro has a bold design and strong performance. In the end, which car is better really depends on what you like more.

Source

The nineties were the bridge that connected the modern automotive era that we’ve got today and the past. There were so many advances during this decade, from V8 powered sport sedans to the rise of the luxury SUV. There are a lot of things that we take for granted these days but in the nineties these advances were massive breakthroughs. Join us as we look back at the 90s cars that changed the automotive industry.

Lincoln Navigator

Lincoln Navigator
Mecum

Lincoln deserves their flowers, because had it not been for the Navigator we would not have the massive yachts on wheels that we have today. The Navigator was the vehicle that saved the Lincoln brand and launched the “bling bling” era as we knew it. Few cars changed a decade like the Lincoln Navigator did.

Source

This Volkswagen Beetle hot rod was built under previous ownership and is powered by a Chevy V8 linked with a four-speed manual transmission and a quick-change rear end. The car utilizes a modified steel Beetle body mounted over a custom-fabricated and Z’d frame that is fitted with a drilled dropped front axle, rear ladder bars, four-wheel disc brakes, 15″ Weld wheels, and Mickey Thomspon tires. Additional details include tri-bar headlights, a rear-mounted fuel tank, electric door poppers, aluminum interior panels, lap belts for four occupants, bomber-style front bucket seats, and a 12-volt charging outlet. Acquired by the selling dealer in 2025, this Volkswagen Beetle hot rod is now offered at no reserve in Florida with a clean Pennsylvania title describing it as a 1971 Volkswagen Beetle.

The steel Beetle body was shaved, chopped, lengthened, painted metallic green, and mounted over a custom-fabricated and Zd frame with a driveshaft loop under prior ownership. Exterior details include a rear-mounted fuel tank, electronic door poppers, tri-bar headlights, and a windshield visor with “speed holes”.

The 15” Weld Racing wheels are mounted with Mickey Thompson Sportsman tires measuring 26×7.50” up front and 33×21.50” out back. The dropped front axle has been drilled and features a transverse leaf spring, rack-and-pinion steering, and shock absorbers, while the rear suspension has been fitted with ladder bars and adjustable coilovers. Stopping power is provided by four-wheel disc brakes.

Inside, a roll bar has been fitted along with bomber-style bucket seats with black vinyl bottom pads and lap belts. Matching seat pads and lap belts are mounted in the rear, and additional interior elements include aluminum door and dashboard panels, door pulls, and a 12-volt charging outlet.

Instrumentation includes a tachometer, a 160-mph speedometer, and gauges for oil pressure and coolant temperature. The digital odometer shows 38 miles, which is believed to be the distance traveled since completion of the build.

The Chevy V8 is believed to displace 350ci and is equipped with a chrome timing cover and valve covers, MSD ignition wires, and lake pipes. An oil change was performed in preparation for the sale.

Power is delivered to the rear wheels through a four-speed manual transmission and a quick-change rear end.

The car is titled in Pennsylvania, using the dashboard tag from a 1971 Volkswagen Beetle that has been riveted to the front door post.

This 1938 Ford Tudor “Humpback” sedan was built between 2005 and 2007. The steel body was repainted Cadillac White Diamond and Nissan Le Mans Sunset, and the interior was retrimmed to match with bucket seats, Dolphin gauges, an Ididit column, and power windows and door poppers. The car rides on a modified suspension with a Mustang II-style front end and a Ford 8″ rear end, and power comes from a 350ci V8 linked with a TH350 automatic. A four-core radiator, pusher fan, Edelbrock intake manifold, headers, and a dual exhaust system were also installed. Acquired by its current owner in 2017, this custom Humpback is now offered by the seller on behalf of its owner with service records, a car cover, and a clean California title.

The car retains a steel body and its original chassis according to the seller, and it was smoothed, chopped 3.5″ inches, and repainted Cadillac White Diamond and Nissan Le Mans Sunset. The doors are operated by poppers, the bumpers were sectioned, and the running boards were cut for the dual exhaust system on either side and have a welded rolled lip. The windshield wipers require repair.

The car rides on a modified suspension with a Mustang II-style front end with front disc brakes, and lowering blocks were utilized out back. The staggered Gennie steel wheels were painted Nissan Le Mans Sunset to match the body, and they have ’40-style trim rims and hubcaps.

The bucket seats were reupholstered to match the exterior, as were the door panels. Billet pedals and power window cranks were installed, and a Pioneer stereo is mounted in the overhead console.

The Billet Specialties wheel is mounted on an Ididit column, and the transmission is controlled by a concealed shifter. The 4,200 miles on the Dolphin Gauges cluster is believed to represent the mileage driven since completion of the build, and 500 were added by the current owner.

The 350ci V8 is topped by an Edelbrock intake manifold, carburetor, and air cleaner. The four-core radiator is cooled by a pusher fan, and block-hugging headers were installed. The battery was replaced in 2024.

The oil sump, driveshaft, and fuel tank were all painted to match the body. The TH350 automatic is linked to a Ford 8″ rear end, and Flowmaster mufflers were utilized for the dual exhaust system.

Itemized records and a summary are displayed in the gallery.

The car is titled as a 1938 Ford in California utilizing the British Columbia assigned VIN above.

This 1930 Ford Model A coupe was stored for an extended time before it was built into a hot rod between 2009 and 2017. Highlighting the build is a 401ci Nailhead V8 that is topped by an Offenhauser tri-power intake manifold with three two-barrel Rochester carburetors, and it is linked to a Ford 9″ axle through a T5 five-speed manual transmission. The steel body has a 3″ chop by Iversen Originals and was mounted on Speedway frame rails and painted green, and the car rides on a lowered suspension with American Racing Salt Flat wheels mounted over drums. The interior was redone with panels from Brookville and has a Pioneer sound system and Stewart Warner gauges as well as a tilt-out windshield. Acquired by the seller in 2019, this Model A hot rod is now offered with service records and a clean California title in the seller’s name.

The 401ci Nailhead V8 was rebuilt by Wholesale Automotive Machine with .030″-over pistons, a hydraulic camshaft from TA Performance Products, and Offenhauser finned valve covers from Speedway. The three Rochester carburetors are mounted on an Offenhauser intake manifold, and the seller states they were recently rebuilt, mounted on correct secondary baseplates, and fitted with progressive linkage. The headers are from Sanderson, and the aluminum radiator is a Champion unit.

The steel body was removed from its original frame and repairs were performed before it painted green and mounted on frame rails from Speedway. The 3 ” chop was done by Dave Iversen of Iversen Originals. The lights were replaced as part of the build and ’50 Pontiac blue-dot lenses were utilized, and the car has a tilt-out windshield, a fabric roof, and a windshield visor as well as a body-color grille surround with a stainless-steel insert.

The car rides on a drop front end with components from Speedway including hairpin radius rods, a Super Slide spring, and a polished Panhard bar, and Posies supplied the rear spring and shock mounts for the Ford 9″ axle that was sourced from ’69 Bronco. American Racing 15″ Salt Flat staggered wheels around mounted with Firestone tires, and the front drum brakes are from an F-100. The car also has a Vega-style manual steering box, and the brakes were flushed and adjusted recently.

Interior panels were sourced from Brookville, and the bench seat is trimmed in brown vinyl. Behind the seat is a hidden Pioneer CD stereo and speakers, and the under-dashboard heater was converted into a speaker box.

The steering wheel is mounted on column with an OTB gear finned drop. The Stewart Warner cluster indicates 5,500 miles, and the seller notes that less than 500 miles have been accrued since the build was completed.

The T5 five-speed manual utilizes an adapter kit from Bendtsen’s Transmission Center, and the Traction-Lok rear end has 3.50 gearing according to the seller. The ladder bars are chromed, and there are nicks on the frame. Touch-up paint is included.

The car is titled as a 1930 Ford in California using the serial number 2824613, which is stamped on the body number plate above.

Historical images are presented in the gallery along with build records.

This replica of a Ford Model A convertible was produced by Glassic Industries around 1967, and it has been modified with the installation of a Chevrolet 350ci V8 paired with a three-speed automatic transmission. The blue-over-white car is built on the frame and underpinnings of an International Scout 800A. Equipment includes a white convertible top, staggered-width 15″ wheels, front disc and rear drum brakes, an Edelbrock carburetor, exhaust headers, a roll bar, a B&M shifter, and lap belts. The current owner acquired the car in mid-2023 out of Maryland. This Model A replica is now offered on dealer consignment with a clean Nevada title that describes the car as a 1967 ASVE Ford.

Glassic Industries Inc of West Palm Beach, Florida, began production of its “Contemporary Reproduction” of the Ford Model A in 1966. The cars were built on the chassis and running gear of the International Scout 800A and featured fiberglass bodies. Approximately 300 Scout 152ci four-cylinder–powered examples were built through 1971, according to GlassicAnnex.org. Glassic powered its vehicles with Ford 302ci V8 engines beginning around 1972, and a company called Replicars Inc took over the business in 1975 and produced 302-powered examples through 1980.

The fiberglass bodywork of this replica has been repainted in metallic blue and features a white convertible top, a grille guard, a radiator-surround ornament, fenders, bright bumper-like sections, A-pillar-mounted side mirrors, and diamond-plate running boards as well as headlights, taillamps, and turn signals. The seller notes pitting on some of the brightwork.

Staggered-width 15″ wheels are mounted with 205/65 Sailun Atrezzo SH402 front tires and 295/50 Telstar Turbostar G/T rear rubber. Braking is provided by front discs and rear drums.

The cabin features a bench seat upholstered in white vinyl, which is carried over to the door panels and the dashboard. The interior also has a B&M shifter, lap belts, and a roll bar.

An A1C steering wheel sits ahead of a suite of AutoMeter gauges including a 120-mph speedometer. The five-digit odometer shows 7k miles, and true mileage is unknown.

The Chevrolet 350ci V8 was installed under prior ownership and is augmented by a single Edelbrock carburetor, flame-pattern rocker covers, an aftermarket camshaft, and tubular exhaust headers.

Power is sent to the rear wheels through a three-speed Turbo Hydramatic automatic transmission that was installed under previous ownership. Corrosion is noted on underbody components.

The serial number shown on the identification plate pictured above is in the range of other Glassic Model A–style replicas that are reported to have been built in 1967.

The Nevada title lists the car as a 1967 ASVE Ford.

This Factory Five Racing ’33 Hot Rod was assembled by the seller between 2009 and 2011, and it is comprised of yellow, while, and maroon fiberglass bodywork mounted over a jig-welded tube frame. Power is provided by a supercharged 4.6-liter V8 linked with a four-speed automatic transmission, and the car rides on adjustable coilovers along with 15″ American Racing Salt Flat wheels with Mickey Thompson tires. Wilwood disc brakes and power steering were fitted during the build, and styling details include a raked windshield, white bodyside accents, red pinstriping, a front fender cutout, a black soft top, and triangulated roll hoops. The aircraft-themed cabin features bomber-style seats, quilted red vinyl upholstery, a riveted console, a magneto-style ignition switch, and Classic Instruments gauges. This FFR ’33 Hot Rod is offered with build records and a clean Arizona title in the seller’s name describing the car as a 1933 KINL.

The fiberglass roadster bodywork is finished in yellow with a maroon-outlined white oval accent on the bodysides. Further styling details include a domed hood, a raked windshield, decklid pinstriping, a custom black fabric soft top, a polished grille, LED headlights, and billet side mirrors. Full and cut-out engine covers are included in the sale, and photos of both configurations are provided in the gallery. A “black chrome” finish was applied to the grille, windshield frame, valve covers, supercharger, and front suspension components during the build.

American Racing Salt Flat 15″ wheels wear 26×6″ front and 28×12″ rear Mickey Thompson S/R rubber. The Factory Five Racing ’33 Hot Rod was designed with a focus on high-performance handling, and the seller tells us that this example rides on QA1 adjustable coilovers and unequal-length control arms. Braking is handled by four-wheel discs with yellow Wilwood calipers, and it is equipped with electrically assisted power steering.

The aviation-themed cabin features fixed-back bomber-style seats trimmed in red vinyl with Boeing logos embroidered on the backrests, and triangulated roll hoops and four-point racing harnesses protect the occupants. A riveted center console houses a piston-style shifter, switchgear, and cupholders, and the ignition is actuated via a vintage Bendix Scintilla magneto-style switch.

The Grant steering wheel sits on a tilting column with billet stalks, and a suite of Classic Instruments Moal Bomber Series gauges is mounted on the dashboard fascia. The odometer shows approximately 3,100 miles, which represents the mileage accumulated since the completion of the build.

The 4.6-liter “Modular” V8 breathes through a Roots-style supercharger and a custom air intake, and a “black chrome” finish was applied to the aforementioned induction components. A billet accessory drive setup sits between the engine and the aluminum radiator, and further details include MSD ignition, stainless-steel headers, a lithium battery, an AutoTrend EFI ignition system, Infinitybox wiring, and a dual exhaust system with four polished finishers. Pinstriping adorns the underside of the hood, and various underhood components have been chromed or polished. The intake piping is disconnected.

Power is routed through a four-speed automatic transmission and a Ford 8.8″ solid rear axle. Photos of the body-color belly pans and boxed triangulated crossmembers are displayed in the gallery.

Photos taken during the build process are provided in the gallery.

Open-top driving is one of the finest motoring pleasures. Just imagine yourself driving along the coastal roads on warm summer evenings, enjoying the views and sitting behind the wheel of a sporty, two-seater convertible that drips with style and presence. Even though true roadsters are rare nowadays, they are still relevant since their driving dynamics are unique. Let’s see what cars created this class, what the most desirable examples are, what roadsters you should invest in, and their place in the automotive landscape. 

MG B

01 Mgb
Photo Credit: Pinterest

One of the most popular and typical British roadsters from the ’60s is the MG B. Introduced in 1962, MG B was a fairly modern car with unibody construction, a roomy interior, and decent suspension and steering. Some contemporary tests call MG B underpowered, and 95 hp from a 1.8-liter engine certainly isn’t much, but since the car weighs only 2200 lbs, it can keep up with modern traffic. MG produced over 400,000 of all variants, so finding one won’t be a problem.

Austin Healey Sprite Mk1

Austin-Healey Sprite - Austin-Healey
Photo Credit: AutoWP

The little, bug-eyed Sprite Mk1 is a tiny roadster with two seats, a cramped interior, and a small trunk. It weighs 1500 lbs and is powered by a 943 ccm engine with 45 hp. Yes, we know it sounds like a joke. But, the Sprite Mk1 was an immensely popular roadster back in its day, and people here loved it for its compact size, peppy engine, nice driving dynamics, and pure driving feel. 

BMW Z3

1997 Bmw Z3 Atlantic Blue 7
Photo Credit: Edmunds

Roadsters became pretty popular in the ’90s, with Mazda Miata showing the way, and all relevant car companies wanted a piece of the action. Using the E36 Compact 3 Series platform and rear suspension out of the old E30 model and covering it with a sexy new open-top body, BMW created the first Z3 model. The result was a stylish convertible with two seats, a lineup of potent four and six-cylinder engines, lightweight, and excellent driving dynamics. The car was significantly more expensive than the Miata but also faster and more luxurious. 

Honda Beat

Honda Beat 1991 Pictures 1 1578928582
Photo Credit: Honda

The spiritual successor of the classic Honda S600 roadster is the ’90s Honda Beat. Introduced in 1991 and sold until 1996, the Beat was a small, elegant roadster with a displacement of just 660 cm and 63 hp. At just 1,656 pounds, it was immensely fun to drive, and over 33,000 were made in the five-year production run. 

Triumph Spitfire

Triumph Spitfire - Triumph
Photo Credit: Flickr

This legendary roadster was introduced in 1962 and powered by a pretty diminutive 1.1-liter four-cylinder engine with 63 hp. Over the years, the power grew to the 1.5-liter engine with 71 hp and more torque, which improved the driving dynamics. Like all other British roadsters, the biggest market was the US, and from 314,000 made, most ended up here. This means the Spitfire is easy to come by and inexpensive to purchase. 

Mercedes SL R129

1995 Mercedes Benz 500sl 15847384955e8f93aad47a19e1995 Mercedes Benz 500sl 15839630278764daimg 1368 1
Photo Credit: Car Domain

What do you get when looking for a luxurious and powerful roadster? The mid-’90s SL 600 with V12 engine. Today, those cars are significantly cheaper, but not for long, since more and more people have realized how good the SL 600 is. If you want a bit lower price and maintenance costs, look for a V8-powered SL 500, which is almost as good to drive. 

Mazda Miata

Photo Credit: Net Car Show

One of the most successful stories in the car industry must be the tale about Mazda’s Miata roadster and how this little car changed the world and became a best-selling open-top model in history, passing the 1 million mark in 2013. The Miata’s secret was simplicity, lightweight, and balance. Mazda didn’t try to invent something new; they just copied the basic concept of a classic British roadster, added modern materials and design, and made the whole thing dependable and agile. With 116 hp from a twin-cam 1.6-liter engine, it may not sound as much, but in a 2,200 lb car, it’s more than enough.

Triumph TR6

Photo Credit: Trade Classics

If the Spitfire was Triumph’s roadster for the masses, the TR6 was a car for a serious lover of open-air driving and speed. The Spitfire could be considered underpowered despite weighing only 1500 lbs, but the TR6 had decent power and convincing performance straight out of the box. Production ended in 1976 after more than 90,000 were made, and today, TR6 is a popular choice for classic roadster fans who want old-school looks and feel but with decent performance and speed. 

Datsun Fairlady Roadster

Fairlady Nissans 1st Sports Car 1966 Datsun 1600 Roadster00909 8x7tpk7apii 0ci0po 1200x900
Photo Credit: AutoWP

One of the most interesting Japanese copies of European cars was a cute and compact Datsun Fairlady Roadster built from 1959 to 1970, also known as Datsun Sports. However, Datsun did more than just copy the British. It gave the little roadster some significant power with the 2.0-liter engine, better handling, and driving dynamics. Most importantly, it guaranteed the quality of the cars, which is something that British examples had difficulties with. 

Alfa Romeo Spider

1966 Alfa Romeo 1600 Duetto Spider, The Graduate
Photo Credit: Mecum

Introduced in 1966, the Alfa Romeo Spider was an Italian answer to the popularity of British roadsters. Eventually, it became globally popular and became an Alfa Romeo model with the longest production run. While the rest of the roadsters vanished from the American market, Alfa managed to sell Spiders in 1994, which shows how popular this car was here. The engine choices ranged from 1.3 to 2.0-liter four-cylinder with 105 to 130 hp. Earlier cars had carburetors, and later models had fuel injection systems. 

Porsche Boxster

Photo Credit: Car And Driver

It has been almost 30 years since Porsche introduced this roadster; it is safe to say that the Boxster revolutionized the concept of an open-top fun car and stood the test of time as a future classic that you can own today. The Boxster has a mid-mounted flat-six engine, perfect balance, two trunks, and sublime handling. Since the base 2.5-liter delivers a healthy 200 hp, it makes even the most affordable Boxsters pretty agile, fast, and exciting to drive, especially if paired with a 6-speed manual transmission. 

Fiat 124 Spider

Fiat 124 Spider, 1,4 L, Bj. 1970 (2016 07 02 Sp)
Photo Credit: Mecum

Introduced in 1966 and sold in America until 1985, the Fiat 124 Spider was designed by Pininfarina and built on the 124 Sedan platform. The mechanics were pretty straightforward, with a twin-cam engine, 4-speed manual transmission, and rear-wheel drive. The 124 Spider was one of the more comfortable options, featuring a roomy cabin, big trunk, and good ride quality, so nice examples are sought after. 

Honda S2000

1200px Hondas2000 004
Photo Credit: Wiki

This model was a valid driver’s car with all the important features like lightweight construction, ideal weight distribution, powerful and rev-happy engine, and razor-sharp handling in an elegant open-top package. Under the hood was a 2.0 or 2.2-liter four-cylinder engine with 240 hp, which was the car’s main selling point. Thanks to intelligent engineering and lightweight, the S2000 had respectable performance and perfect handling, for which it was universally praised. 

Mercedes SL R107

Mercedes-Benz R107 and C107 - Mercedes-Benz SLC-Class
Photo Credit: Wiki

This generation was in production from 1971 to 1989 and is very common. The engine choices include one six-cylinder engine and several V8s, including the range-topping 560 V8. We recommend you find a 450 or 500 V8 engine since they are the most popular and offer the best combination of power and efficiency. 

Sunbeam Alpine

Sunbeamtigermk1 01
Photo Credit: Net Car Show

One of the classic roadster class’s most fascinating but forgotten models is the Sunbeam Alpine, an English two-seater convertible built from 1959 to 1968. The Sunbeam is a classic English brand, long gone from the market and remembered by only a handful of enthusiasts. But Alpine is a very nice-looking car with dependable and conventional mechanicals and a small 1.5—or 1.7-liter four-cylinder engine. 

Chrysler Crossfire SRT6

Chrysler Crossfire Limited Roadster 928
Photo Credit: Chrysler

Do you remember Chrysler Crossfire? In 2004, Crossfire was a Mercedes SLK with a different body but the same mechanics and drive train. Even though the press didn’t like the car, one version with proper performance credentials was the Crossfire SRT6. The SRT6 was, as expected, an SLK, but this time, it was AMG, which meant that it was equipped with an AMG-prepared V6 engine delivering 330 hp, performance-tuned suspension, brakes, and other components. 

Jensen Healey

Jensen-Healey - Car
Photo Credit: Flickr

In a desperate attempt to save the company, Jensen launched the Jensen Healey roadster in 1972. Under the hood was a 2.0-liter Lotus-derived engine with around 100 hp and modest performance. However, the modern design and nice stance attracted buyers. As with all British cars from the ’70s, the Healey had problems with rust and electrics, which is why they are cheap today. 

Fiat 850 Spider

Photo Credit: Auto Evolution

Fiat has always been one of the best producers of superminis and compact cars, often making sportier, open-top versions for keen buyers. This is exactly what the 850 Spider is. Despite looking like a toy compared to other full-size cars of the period, the 850 Spider was a capable driving machine because it was so light and nimble. With just 49 hp, the car couldn’t outrun any Porsches, but since it was so small, it could provide much driving excitement.

Pontiac Solstice

1659035097 X09pn St014 Mmthumb
Photo Credit: GM

Although the Solstice roadster couldn’t save the company or become a sales hit, it is still one of the best Pontiacs ever made and a very competent little car with great potential. Imagined as a little sports convertible to fight the Audi TT and BMW Z4, the Solstice was, in fact, faster and nimbler than most of its rivals. With a 2.4-liter turbocharged engine and 260 hp on tap, the Solstice had vivid performance and competent handling. 

Toyota MR2

Photo Credit: Top Speed

One of the most compact and affordable sports cars with an open top is the Toyota MR2. Toyota introduced it in 1984 and sold it until 2007 in three generations. The MR2 was always a great-handling, lively-performing two-seater model with great driving dynamics. The last generation was known to be tricky to drive, but it was still enormous fun and provided owners with endless hours of open-top driving.

Source

It seems every Big Three manufacturer who built a compact car in the early 1960s also created a forward-control truck based on the same platform. Of the bunch, only Chevrolet offered two, with our Pick of the Day being the most interesting: the 1961 Chevrolet Corvair 95 Rampside. It is listed for sale on ClassicCars.com by a dealer in Hopedale, Massachusetts. (Click on the link to view the listing)

Both Chevrolet and Ford introduced forward-control trucks in 1961. They were not similar aside of being based on their respective compacts. Ford’s Falcon-based Econoline was entirely conventional, while the Chevrolet Corvair Greenbriar van and Corvair 95 trucks were the polar opposite. The latter included the Corvan and two pickups: Loadside and Rampside. “Driver’s up front . . . engine’s in the rear . . . all the rest is load space!” read one brochure, touting the cubic-feet of load space assisted by the flat floor and elimination of the hood.

While the Corvan was the commercial van Corvair (and the Greenbriar the civilian van), the Loadside and Rampside were the pickup truck versions of the same vehicle. The Loadside was a typical pickup with a gate in the rear. Contrast this with the Rampside, which featured both the rear gate plus a side gate that dropped down to form a ramp for easy loading and unloading. Chevrolet claimed 1,900 cargoes were cake, with gross vehicle weight being a robust 4,600 pounds—impressive for a 145ci flat-six.

Power for the 1961 Corvair was either an air-cooled, 80-horsepower Turbo-Air 6 (available with three-speed, four-speed, or Powerglide) or 98-horse Super Turbo Air 6 (ditto), but the Corvair Greenbriar and 95s made do with the former.

Chevrolet touted advantages that only its rear-engined truck could espouse, like low, accessible loading height and driver comfort due to the engine being in the rear (versus between the two front seats, like on the Econoline). Of course, another notable feature was the four-wheel independent suspension with transaxle. A first for a U.S. truck, the suspension added “stability to truck performance and to take the roughness out of road surfaces.”

Each of the Corvair trucks had different production lifespans: the Greenbriar was produced from 1961-65, while the Corvan was available through 1964. For the pickups, the Loadside was only available 1961-62, while the Rampside was produced through 1964.

This 1961 Chevrolet Corvair 95 Rampside stands out from the others due to the four-speed manual backing the 80-horse six. The two-tone paint just looks right, and it’s complemented by the chrome grille and optional chrome bumpers (white was standard). Other features include “West Coast” mirrors, rhino-lined bed, and mag wheel covers, a post-1965 addition. “Spotless interior, optional heater, AM/FM radio, and blinkers,” says the seller. Blinkers? Nonetheless, “the underside is very clean.”

For 1964, Chevrolet introduced a more conventional Chevy-Van based on the Chevy II (with the family-oriented Sportvan appearing the following year), though a pickup was never offered. That makes this 1961 Rampside quite unique. While the 10,787 built (the peak during its existence) sounds somewhat generous, the Rampside was a disposable workhorse so they are few and far between. For $27,500 (sans the Corvair Monza GT go-kart), this is a fine conversation piece at car shows and landscaping jobs alike.

Click here for this ClassicCars.com Pick of the Day.