Skip to main content

Not all cars are built for real driving enthusiasts. Some are underpowered, unreliable, or just plain frustrating to drive. In 2025, serious drivers know which models to steer clear of—whether it’s due to poor handling, lackluster performance, or constant repairs. From disappointing sports cars to boring daily drivers, these are 40 cars that no true gearhead would ever want to own! If you love the thrill of driving, these are the models you should definitely avoid at all costs.

Ford SVT Raptor – The Overhyped Beast That Can’t Keep Up!

Ford

The Ford SVT Raptor looks like an off-road beast, but for serious drivers, it’s too heavy, too wide, and not as fast as it looks. Its bulky size makes city driving a hassle, and despite its power, it’s not the best on-road performer. In 2025, better options exist for off-road enthusiasts.

Hyundai Sonata – The Snooze-Worthy Sedan No One Wants to Drive!

Hyundai

The Hyundai Sonata is reliable, but for serious drivers, it’s boring and uninspiring. With soft handling, slow acceleration, and a dull driving experience, it feels more like an appliance than a car. In 2025, performance-focused drivers avoid it, opting for sedans with better speed, handling, and overall excitement.

Kia Telluride – The Overrated SUV That Doesn’t Live Up to the Hype!

Kia

The Kia Telluride gets praise for its looks and features, but serious drivers find it slow, heavy, and dull to drive. Its weak acceleration and soft handling make it feel more like a minivan than an SUV. In 2025, true enthusiasts avoid it, choosing SUVs with better power and performance.

Ford Escape – The Dull SUV That Fails to Impress!

Ford

The Ford Escape is practical but painfully dull to drive. With uninspiring handling, sluggish acceleration, and a generic design, it offers nothing for serious drivers. Its soft suspension and lack of road feel make it forgettable. In 2025, enthusiasts avoid it, opting for SUVs with more power and personality.

Aston Martin Vantage AMR – A Manual Supercar That Misses the Mark

Aston Martin

The Aston Martin Vantage AMR looks fast and exciting, but it falls short. The manual transmission feels rough, the steering is not sharp, and it’s slower than other sports cars. In 2025, serious drivers avoid it, choosing cars that are quicker, smoother, and more fun to drive.

Audi A6 Allroad – A Wagon That Tries Too Hard

Audi

The Audi A6 Allroad looks like an off-road-ready luxury wagon, but it falls short. It’s too heavy, not sporty enough, and lacks real off-road ability. The ride feels sluggish, and serious drivers find better options. In 2025, enthusiasts avoid it, choosing cars with better speed, handling, and purpose.

Audi SQ7 – A Fast SUV That Feels Too Heavy

Audi

The Audi SQ7 has a strong engine, but its heavy weight and soft handling make it less exciting for serious drivers. It feels big and slow in corners, lacking the sharp response expected from a performance SUV. In 2025, enthusiasts avoid it, choosing SUVs that are lighter, quicker, and more fun to drive.

BMW 2 Series Gran Coupe – A BMW That Doesn’t Feel Like One

BMW

The BMW 2 Series Gran Coupe may wear the BMW badge, but it lacks the sporty feel of the brand’s true performance cars. With front-wheel drive, dull handling, and a cramped interior, it disappoints serious drivers. In 2025, enthusiasts avoid it, choosing real BMWs with better performance and driving feel.

BMW M2 CS – The Pricey Performance Car That Just Isn’t Worth It!

BMW

The BMW M2 CS promises track-ready performance, but it feels too stiff for daily driving and too expensive for what it offers. While it’s fast, it lacks the refinement of other M models, making it less enjoyable for serious drivers. In 2025, enthusiasts look elsewhere for better balance and value.

Bentley Bentayga Speed – Luxury on Wheels, but Zero Thrill!

Bentley

The Bentley Bentayga Speed has big power, but its heavy weight and soft handling make it boring to drive. It’s more about luxury than excitement, and for serious drivers, it lacks the sharpness expected from a high-performance SUV. In 2025, enthusiasts avoid it, choosing SUVs with better handling and agility.

Mitsubishi Mirage – The Bare-Bones Car That’s Painfully Slow!

Mitsubishi

The Mitsubishi Mirage is one of the weakest cars on the road. With poor handling, weak acceleration, and a cheap interior, it offers nothing for serious drivers. It’s slow, noisy, and boring, making it one of the least exciting cars in 2025. Enthusiasts avoid it at all costs.

Cadillac ATS – A Luxury Sedan That Misses the Mark

GM

The Cadillac ATS was made to compete with BMW and Mercedes, but it does not handle as well. It has a stiff ride, small interior, and reliability issues. In 2025, serious drivers avoid it, choosing cars that are smoother, more comfortable, and built to last.

Toyota C-HR – The Lifeless SUV That Struggles to Keep Up!

Motor Trend

The Toyota C-HR looks modern and stylish, but it drives slow and feels unresponsive. Its weak engine, sluggish acceleration, and lack of all-wheel drive make it disappointing for serious drivers. In 2025, enthusiasts avoid it, choosing SUVs that are quicker, more fun, and better to drive.

Toyota Corolla Hatchback – Dependable but Dull as Dishwater!

Motor Trend

The Toyota Corolla Hatchback is good on gas and dependable, but it lacks power and excitement. Its slow engine and soft handling make it dull for serious drivers. While it’s great for daily driving, in 2025, enthusiasts avoid it, choosing cars that are faster, sharper, and more fun to drive.

Kia Soul – A Funky Car That’s No Fun to Drive

Motor Trend

The Kia Soul has a boxy design and good cargo space, but it lacks speed and sporty handling. Its weak engine and dull driving feel make it boring for serious drivers. In 2025, enthusiasts avoid it, choosing cars that are quicker, smoother, and more exciting behind the wheel.

Jeep Compass – An SUV That Lacks Power and Adventure

Jeep

The Jeep Compass looks rugged, but it struggles with weak acceleration and dull handling. Its underpowered engine and sluggish response make it disappointing for serious drivers. While it has Jeep styling, it lacks real off-road capability. In 2025, enthusiasts avoid it, choosing SUVs that are stronger and more fun to drive.

Alfa Romeo Giulia – Fast but Full of Problems

Alfa Romeo

The Alfa Romeo Giulia has sharp handling and a powerful engine, but it suffers from reliability issues and expensive repairs. While fun to drive, its unpredictable electronics and maintenance costs make it a headache. In 2025, serious drivers avoid it, choosing cars that are fast, reliable, and less frustrating to own.

Dodge Journey – An SUV That Feels Outdated

Dodge

The Dodge Journey is slow, heavy, and lacking modern features. Its weak engine, poor handling, and outdated interior make it one of the least exciting SUVs to drive. In 2025, serious drivers avoid it, choosing SUVs that are quicker, safer, and more fun on the road.

Fiat 500L – A Slow and Clumsy Hatchback

Fiat

The Fiat 500L looks unique, but it feels sluggish and awkward to drive. With a weak engine, poor handling, and cheap interior, it fails to impress serious drivers. In 2025, enthusiasts avoid it, choosing cars that are faster, more reliable, and actually fun behind the wheel.

Fiat 500X – A Crossover That Falls Short

Fiat

The Fiat 500X has a quirky design, but it feels underpowered and lacks sharp handling. Its slow acceleration, cramped interior, and reliability issues make it a poor choice for serious drivers. In 2025, enthusiasts avoid it, choosing SUVs that are faster, more comfortable, and better built.

Jeep Renegade – All Show, No Go – The SUV That Can’t Handle the Trails or the Streets!

Jeep

The Jeep Renegade has rugged looks, but it lacks power and real off-road ability. Its slow acceleration, stiff ride, and cramped interior make it disappointing for serious drivers. In 2025, enthusiasts avoid it, choosing SUVs that are quicker, smoother, and actually capable on and off the road.

Land Rover Discovery Sport – Luxury SUV with Too Many Problems

Range Rover

The Land Rover Discovery Sport looks stylish and rugged, but it suffers from reliability issues and expensive repairs. Its slow acceleration, average handling, and tech glitches make it frustrating to own. In 2025, serious drivers avoid it, choosing SUVs that are more dependable, powerful, and fun to drive.

Nissan Titan XD – A Truck That Tries Too Hard

Nissan

The Nissan Titan XD was meant to bridge the gap between light-duty and heavy-duty trucks, but it fails at both. Its underwhelming towing capacity, poor fuel economy, and sluggish ride make it a tough sell for serious drivers. In 2025, truck buyers avoid it, choosing stronger and more capable alternatives.

Smart EQ ForTwo – Tiny, Slow, and Impractical

Motor Trend

The Smart EQ ForTwo is small and easy to park, but that’s where the good ends. Its short range, weak acceleration, and cramped interior make it frustrating for serious drivers. In 2025, enthusiasts avoid it, choosing EVs that are faster, have better range, and are actually fun to drive.

Subaru WRX – A Former Rally Legend That Feels Slow and Outdated!

Motor Trend

The Subaru WRX was once a rally-inspired legend, but in 2025, it feels outdated. Its stiff ride, laggy turbo, and cheap interior make it less exciting than before. While it still has all-wheel drive, serious drivers now look elsewhere for cars that offer better refinement, power, and handling.

Acura ILX – A Luxury Sedan That Feels Cheap

Motor Trend

The Acura ILX wears a luxury badge, but it feels outdated and uninspiring. With a weak engine, dull handling, and an aging interior, it fails to compete with modern rivals. In 2025, serious drivers avoid it, choosing sedans that are faster, more refined, and actually fun to drive.

Chevrolet Spark – Cheap, Slow, and No Fun

GM

The Chevrolet Spark is small and fuel-efficient, but that’s about it. Its weak engine, sluggish acceleration, and basic interior make it boring for serious drivers. It struggles on highways and feels cheap inside. In 2025, enthusiasts avoid it, choosing cars that are faster, safer, and more enjoyable to drive.

Chrysler 300 – A Big Sedan That Feels Outdated

Chrysler

The Chrysler 300 has a bold look and a strong V8 option, but it feels heavy, outdated, and lacks sharp handling. Its aging design and poor fuel economy make it less appealing for serious drivers. In 2025, enthusiasts avoid it, choosing sedans that are quicker, more refined, and modern.

Kia Cadenza – A Luxury Sedan That Fails to Stand Out

KIA

The Kia Cadenza is comfortable and smooth, but it feels slow and boring. Its soft handling and plain design make it uninteresting for serious drivers. In 2025, people avoid it, choosing cars that are quicker, sportier, and more fun to drive.

Buick Encore GX – A Small SUV That Feels Weak

Buick

The Buick Encore GX looks stylish, but it feels slow and lacks power. Its weak engine, soft handling, and boring drive make it unexciting for serious drivers. In 2025, people avoid it, choosing SUVs that are quicker, smoother, and more fun to drive.

Lexus LC 500 Convertible – Beautiful but Too Heavy

Lexus

The Lexus LC 500 Convertible looks sleek and stylish, but it feels too heavy and slow for serious drivers. Its big V8 sounds great, but soft handling and a heavy body make it less exciting than it should be. In 2025, people avoid it, choosing cars that are lighter and more fun to drive.

Hyundai Veloster – Sporty Looks, But Lacks Real Performance

Hyundai

The Hyundai Veloster has a unique design, but it doesn’t live up to its sporty image. Its slow base engine, average handling, and cheap interior make it disappointing for serious drivers. In 2025, people avoid it, choosing cars that are quicker, sharper, and more fun to drive.

Cadillac CT4 450T – A Luxury Sedan That Feels Lacking

Cadillac

The Cadillac CT4 450T looks sleek and modern, but it doesn’t deliver the power or excitement serious drivers expect. Its engine feels underwhelming, and the handling isn’t as sharp as rivals. In 2025, people avoid it, choosing sedans that are faster, more refined, and more fun to drive.

Kia Niro EV – An Electric Car That Feels Slow

Bauer Secure

The Kia Niro EV is efficient, but it lacks power and excitement. Its slow acceleration, average handling, and plain design make it boring for serious drivers. In 2025, people avoid it, choosing EVs that are faster, more fun, and offer a better driving experience.

Chevrolet Trailblazer – The Weak SUV That Struggles to Keep Up!

GM

The Chevrolet Trailblazer looks rugged, but it feels slow and unexciting. Its weak engine, dull handling, and basic interior make it boring for serious drivers. In 2025, people avoid it, choosing SUVs that are quicker, smoother, and more fun to drive.

Toyota Mirai – A Futuristic Car That Feels Limited

Motor Trend

The Toyota Mirai runs on hydrogen fuel, but it lacks power, speed, and fun driving dynamics. Its limited refueling stations and slow acceleration make it impractical for most drivers. In 2025, people avoid it, choosing EVs that are faster, easier to charge, and more exciting to drive.

Mitsubishi Outlander – An SUV That Feels Weak

Audi

The Audi TT RS has a strong engine and sharp looks, but it lacks the excitement and handling of true sports cars. Its heavy feel, numb steering, and front-heavy design make it less engaging for serious drivers. In 2025, people avoid it, choosing cars that are lighter and more fun to drive.

Mitsubishi Outlander – The Underpowered SUV That Can’t Keep Up!

Cars.com

The Mitsubishi Outlander looks modern, but it feels slow and underpowered. Its weak engine, sluggish acceleration, and average handling make it boring for serious drivers. In 2025, people avoid it, choosing SUVs that are quicker, smoother, and more fun to drive.

Lexus UX 250h – A Hybrid SUV That Lacks Power

Lexus Enthusiast

The Lexus UX 250h is efficient and stylish, but it feels slow and unexciting. Its weak hybrid engine, sluggish acceleration, and stiff ride make it disappointing for serious drivers. In 2025, people avoid it, choosing SUVs that are faster, smoother, and more fun to drive.

Buick Regal TourX – The Wagon That Tries but Fails to Impress!

Edmunds

The Buick Regal TourX looks sleek and practical, but it lacks power and excitement. Its weak engine, average handling, and uninspiring drive make it boring for serious drivers. In 2025, people avoid it, choosing wagons that are quicker, sportier, and more fun behind the wheel.

Source

The automotive industry is always changing. Nameplates come and go at a fast pace and their survival is always based on consumer demand. But, there have been dozens of cars that never sold very well that still garnered a following. Take the Pontiac Aztek for example or the Geo Metro, both of which have gained massive popularity decades after being discontinued. We looked back at the discontinued cars that we wish automakers would bring back.

Jaguar XJ220

Car and Driver

The Jaguar XJ220 was the British automaker’s first ever supercar. When it debuted it gained a lot of attention for the sheer beauty and performance. Even Elton John was one of the first owners of an XJ220. Sadly, the sales numbers never picked up for the XJ220 and it just didn’t take off with exotic car buyers like Jaguar hoped it would.

Source

The 1970s weren’t just about big muscle cars—some affordable rides packed way more power than people expected. These hidden gems delivered serious performance without breaking the bank. From lightweight sleepers to underrated V8 beasts, these cheap thrills proved that you didn’t need a fortune to own a fast and fun car.

AMC Gremlin – A Quirky Hatchback with Muscle

Hot Rod

The AMC Gremlin may have looked like a small economy car, but with an optional V8 engine, it had surprising speed. Its lightweight body and rear-wheel drive made it a fun little powerhouse. While its styling was unusual, this ‘70s oddball could pack a punch when properly equipped.

Chevrolet Vega – A Small Car with Big Potential

BAT

The Chevrolet Vega was built as an economy car, but its lightweight design and rear-wheel drive made it a great platform for performance upgrades. While the stock engine wasn’t exciting, models like the Cosworth Vega added extra punch. With the right tuning, this small Chevy could surprise a few muscle cars.

Ford Pinto – A Budget Ride with a Secret Edge

Hot Rod

The Ford Pinto was known as a cheap economy car, but when equipped with the optional V6 or swapped with a V8, it became a sleeper hit. Its lightweight body and rear-wheel drive made it a fun little performer. Despite its reputation, a properly tuned Pinto could hold its own.

AMC Pacer – A Funky Car with Surprising Power

BAT

The AMC Pacer may have looked quirky, but it could be had with a big 6.6L V8 under the hood. Its wide stance and rear-wheel drive gave it decent handling, and with the right upgrades, it packed more punch than expected. This ‘70s oddball was more than just a conversation starter.

Ford Mustang Cobra II – A ‘70s Muscle Car in Disguise

Ford

The Ford Mustang Cobra II looked aggressive with its racing stripes and sporty styling, but it wasn’t just for show. With a 302 V8 under the hood, it had decent power for the time. While it wasn’t as wild as earlier Mustangs, it was a fun and affordable performance option.

Plymouth Sapporo – A Stylish Import with Surprising Performance

Chrysler

The Plymouth Sapporo was a sporty, rear-wheel-drive coupe that offered more than just good looks. With a rev-happy four-cylinder engine, sharp handling, and lightweight design, it was a fun and affordable alternative to bigger muscle cars. While often overlooked, it delivered a punchy and enjoyable driving experience in the ‘70s.

Chevy Chevette – A Tiny Car with Big Potential

Mecum

The Chevy Chevette was built as a simple economy car, but its rear-wheel-drive layout and lightweight body made it a great sleeper candidate. While the stock engine was weak, enthusiasts found ways to swap in bigger, more powerful motors, turning this little hatchback into a surprising pocket rocket of the ‘70s.

Volvo 262C – A Luxury Coupe with Unexpected Power

Auto Evolution

The Volvo 262C was a boxy, Italian-designed coupe that looked more about style than speed. But under the hood, it packed a dependable V6, and with the right tuning, it could surprise muscle cars of its time. Built for comfort yet capable of performance, it was a classy sleeper of the ‘70s.

Mercury Bobcat – A Pint-Sized Sleeper with Potential

BAT

The Mercury Bobcat, often seen as just a rebadged Pinto, had more to offer than meets the eye. With a lightweight body and available V6, it had decent punch for a small car. Enthusiasts found ways to swap in V8s, turning this budget-friendly hatchback into a surprising little rocket.

Stutz Blackhawk – A Luxury Cruiser with Muscle

Mecum

The Stutz Blackhawk wasn’t just about flashy looks—it packed serious power. Under its long, elegant hood sat a massive Pontiac V8, giving it muscle-car-level performance. Built for celebrities and the elite, this over-the-top luxury coupe proved that comfort and horsepower could go hand in hand in the ‘70s.

Chrysler Cordoba – A Luxury Coupe with Hidden Muscle

Flickr

The Chrysler Cordoba was known for its plush interior and smooth ride, but it had more power than expected. With an available 400-cubic-inch V8, it had the muscle to back up its stylish looks. While marketed as a luxury car, it could still pack a punch on the road.

AMC Hornet 360 – A Compact Car with Big Power

Mecum

The AMC Hornet 360 looked like an ordinary compact, but under the hood sat a 360-cubic-inch V8. With rear-wheel drive and surprising speed, it could keep up with bigger muscle cars. Affordable and underrated, this ‘70s sleeper proved that great performance didn’t have to come in a massive package.

1970 Dodge Dart Swinger – A Small Car with Big Attitude

Hot Rod

The 1970 Dodge Dart Swinger may have been compact, but it packed a powerful 340 V8 under the hood. With lightweight construction and rear-wheel drive, it was quick off the line and handled well. Affordable and fun, this Mopar sleeper was one of the best budget muscle cars of the ‘70s.

Volkswagen Type 181 – A Rugged Ride with Surprising Capability

Mecum

The Volkswagen Type 181, also known as “The Thing,” wasn’t built for speed, but its lightweight design and air-cooled engine made it a fun off-road cruiser. With rear-wheel drive and a simple, durable build, it handled rough terrain surprisingly well, proving that performance isn’t just about horsepower.

Subaru BRAT – A Quirky Truck with Surprising Performance

Mecum

The Subaru BRAT may have looked unusual, but its lightweight build, four-wheel drive, and punchy flat-four engine made it a capable performer. Designed for both fun and utility, it could tackle rough terrain while still being quick and nimble on the road. A true hidden gem of the ‘70s!

Subaru BRAT – A Quirky Truck with Surprising Performance

Mecum

The Subaru BRAT may have looked unusual, but its lightweight build, four-wheel drive, and punchy flat-four engine made it a capable performer. Designed for both fun and utility, it could tackle rough terrain while still being quick and nimble on the road. A true hidden gem of the ‘70s!

Source

The automotive market place is ever-changing with consumer tastes, and the current generation of vehicles are more advanced than ever. Computer technology has changed the way that we drive for the better, and the new crop of cars are implementing it more than ever. However, that doesn’t mean there aren’t several new cars drivers should avoid.

Unfortunately, there are also new cars that have been rushed and are oftentimes outdated relics from a previous generation. Drivers also have the new batch of crossovers that are making their way onto the market. We are going to be taking a look at 40 new cars that are best left avoided according to Consumer Reports.

40. Ford SVT Raptor

SVT Raptor
via: Ford

The Ford Raptor has been a sales success for the automaker, incorporating everything that made the Lightning a great truck and adding off-road prowess to it. But the Raptor has also had its fair share of reliability issues, making it a truck to potentially avoid for the consumers who purchased these trucks. The Raptor has been recalled for issues that pertain to a faulty timing chain, and this problem happens well under the 100k mileage market. This also means the problem is not covered by the warranty and thus the truck is rendered useless. It’s become one to avoid without a doubt.

Raptor
via: Ford

Being that the Raptor is one of the most expensive pickup trucks on the market, this represents a real problem. Consumers have been lodging complaints against Ford to no avail. When you spend this amount of money on a truck, you want it to be reliable. If you’re in the market for a performance pickup truck the Raptor is a car to avoid, as the pitfalls of reliability are just too much.

Source

For decades, the Ford Mustang and Chevrolet Camaro have battled for muscle car supremacy. From drag strips to daily streets, these pony cars define American performance. With power, style, and fierce fan loyalty, their rivalry remains legendary. In this showdown, we compare history, performance, design, and culture to declare a winner.

The Birth of the Pony Car War: 1964.5 Mustang vs. 1967 Camaro

Barrett Jackson

Ford launched the Mustang in 1964, creating an entirely new market for stylish, performance-driven cars. Its immediate popularity forced Chevrolet to respond in 1967 with the Camaro, a direct competitor. This rivalry quickly intensified, driving innovation and performance advancements that would forever shape the landscape of American muscle cars.

Why Ford Beat Chevy to the Punch: Mustang’s Early Dominance

Hot Rod

Ford made the Mustang in 1964. It was a small, fast car that people loved right away. It sold well before Chevy made the Camaro in 1967. By then, Mustang was already popular, and many people had bought one. This gave Ford a big lead in the pony car race.

Chevy’s Response: How the Camaro Was Built to Take on Mustang

Hot Rod

Chevy saw how well the Mustang was selling and knew they needed a rival. In 1967, they made the Camaro, a fast and stylish car built to compete. It had strong engines and a sporty look. Though Mustang had a head start, Camaro quickly became a favorite among car fans.

The 1969 Camaro Z/28 vs. Boss 302 Mustang: Track-Ready Legends

BAT

The 1969 Camaro Z/28 and Boss 302 Mustang were built for the track. The Z/28 had a high-revving 302 V8 and sharp handling, making it a Trans-Am favorite. The Boss 302 was Ford’s answer, blending power and agility. Both became legends, proving their strength in one of racing’s greatest rivalries.

Mustang’s Mach 1 vs. Camaro’s SS: Which Had the Better Muscle?

BAT

The Mustang Mach 1 and Camaro SS were made for speed. The Mach 1 had strong V8 engines and a bold look. The Camaro SS brought big power and sharp styling. Both cars were fast and exciting, making people argue for years about which one was the true muscle car king.

First-Gen Styling: Which Classic Look Stood the Test of Time?

BAT

The first Mustang and Camaro had unique looks that made them stand out. The Mustang was sleek and sporty, while the Camaro had a tougher style. Both cars still turn heads today. Their designs have lasted for decades, showing why they remain two of the most popular classic cars ever.

The 1970s Struggle: Emissions and the Death of Muscle Power

BAT

In the 1970s, new rules changed cars. Emissions laws made engines weaker, and gas prices went up. Muscle cars like the Mustang and Camaro lost power. People wanted smaller, fuel-efficient cars instead. It was a tough time, but these classics survived, waiting for the return of high-performance years later.

The Return of Performance: Fox-Body Mustangs vs. 3rd-Gen Camaros

Cars & Bids

In the 1980s, muscle cars made a comeback. The Fox-body Mustang was light and quick, with strong V8 options. The 3rd-gen Camaro had sharp styling and better handling. Both brought performance back after years of slow cars. This era helped revive the Mustang vs. Camaro rivalry for a new generation.

The 1990s Rebirth: SN95 Mustang vs. 4th-Gen Camaro

Car and Driver

In the 1990s, muscle cars got faster again. The SN95 Mustang had a new design and a strong V8. The 4th-gen Camaro came with more power and sharp looks. Both cars brought excitement back to the streets, making the Mustang vs. Camaro rivalry stronger than ever for a new era.

Modern Muscle: 2010+ Mustang vs. Camaro – The Retro Comeback

GM

In 2010, muscle cars went back to their roots. The Mustang got a bold, retro look with strong V8 power. The Camaro returned with aggressive styling and big performance. Both brought back the classic rivalry, mixing old-school muscle with modern tech, proving that pony cars were here to stay.

Small Block vs. Big Block: Who Built the Better Powerplant?

Cars & Bids

Small block engines are light and quick, giving cars better handling. Big block engines are heavier but have more power for straight-line speed. Both the Mustang and Camaro used them in different ways. Some drivers prefer high-revving small blocks, while others love the raw strength of a big block motor.

The Best-Sounding V8: Mustang Coyote vs. Camaro LT1

GM

The Mustang’s Coyote V8 has a high-revving roar, while the Camaro’s LT1 delivers a deep, aggressive rumble. Both sound incredible, but they have different tones. Some prefer the sharp scream of the Coyote, while others love the LT1’s classic muscle car growl. Either way, both engines turn heads.

Quarter-Mile Showdown: Which Car Ruled the Drag Strip?

Car & Driver

The Mustang and Camaro have been racing for years. The Mustang is quick off the line, while the Camaro has strong power for high speeds. Both have won drag races, and fans still argue over which one is faster. No matter the winner, both cars are built for pure speed.

Handling Matters: Mustang’s Independent Rear vs. Camaro’s IRS

Car & Driver

The Mustang and Camaro use different suspension setups for handling. Older Mustangs had a solid rear axle, making them great for drag racing but tough on corners. The Camaro’s IRS gave it better grip and control. Today, both cars use IRS, making them faster and smoother on winding roads.

Turbo vs. V8: Camaro 2.0T vs. Mustang EcoBoost

Car & Driver

The Camaro 2.0T and Mustang EcoBoost bring turbo power to the pony car world. The Mustang’s EcoBoost is quick and fuel-efficient, while the Camaro’s 2.0T offers sharp handling and balance. Both provide strong performance without a V8, making them great options for drivers who want speed with better mileage.

Supercharged Beasts: GT500 vs. ZL1 – Who Owns the Streets?

Car & Driver

The Mustang GT500 and Camaro ZL1 are built for pure speed. The GT500 packs a supercharged V8 with brutal acceleration, while the ZL1 delivers raw power with sharp handling. Both dominate the streets and the track, leaving fans debating which one is the true king of modern muscle.

Track Champion: Shelby GT350 vs. Camaro SS 1LE

Car & Driver

The Shelby GT350 and Camaro SS 1LE were made for the track. The GT350’s high-revving V8 and sharp steering make it a corner-carving machine. The SS 1LE brings balanced handling and strong V8 power. Both deliver thrilling performance, leaving drivers debating which one is the ultimate track champion.

Which Pony Car Brakes Better? Stopping Power Comparison

Ford

Braking is just as important as speed. The Mustang and Camaro both offer strong braking systems, but performance varies by model. The GT500 and ZL1 have big Brembo brakes for quick stops, while base models rely on smaller setups. On the track, both deliver solid stopping power, but results vary.

6-Speed vs. 10-Speed: Transmission Wars

Ford

The Mustang and Camaro come with two transmission options. The 6-speed manual gives a hands-on driving feel, while the 10-speed automatic shifts fast for better speed. Some drivers love the control of a manual, while others prefer the smooth and quick shifts of an automatic for daily driving.

Gas Guzzler or Efficiency King? Fuel Economy Face-Off

Ford

The Mustang and Camaro are built for speed, but fuel economy matters too. The V8 models use more gas, giving raw power but lower miles per gallon. The turbocharged versions offer better efficiency while still being quick. Drivers must choose between muscle car performance or saving fuel on daily drives.

Who Had the More Aggressive Stance? Camaro vs. Mustang Styling

Hot Rod

The Mustang and Camaro have bold designs, but their looks are different. The Mustang has a sleek, classic shape with sharp lines. The Camaro sits lower and wider, giving it a more aggressive stance. Both cars turn heads, but some prefer the Mustang’s heritage, while others love the Camaro’s tough style.

Retro vs. Modern: Which Design Evolution Did It Best?

GM

The Mustang and Camaro have changed over the years, blending old-school style with modern performance. The Mustang keeps its classic shape with modern touches, staying true to its roots. The Camaro has a more aggressive, futuristic look. Both balance heritage and innovation, but fans debate which evolution captures the best design.

Convertible Showdown: Camaro Drop-Top vs. Mustang Ragtop

Hot Rod

The Camaro and Mustang both offer convertible models for open-air driving. The Mustang convertible keeps its classic style and smooth ride, making it great for cruising. The Camaro drop-top has a lower stance and sportier handling. Both deliver fun in the sun, but drivers debate which one feels better topless.

Cockpit Wars: Interior Comfort and Tech Over the Years

Hot Rod

The Mustang and Camaro have evolved inside as much as under the hood. The Mustang’s interior focuses on comfort with a classic layout and modern tech. The Camaro’s cockpit feels sportier, with a lower seating position and driver-focused design. Both have improved over the years, but preferences come down to style and usability.

Infotainment Battle: Ford Sync vs. Chevy MyLink

Motor Trend

The Mustang and Camaro offer advanced infotainment systems to keep drivers connected. Ford Sync is user-friendly, with voice control and smartphone integration. Chevy MyLink provides a responsive touchscreen and easy navigation. Both systems support Apple CarPlay and Android Auto, but drivers debate which one delivers the best tech experience on the road.

Which One Feels More Like a Sports Car? Driving Experience Breakdown

Barrett Jackson

The Mustang and Camaro both bring muscle car power, but their driving feel is different. The Camaro sits lower, with tighter handling and a cockpit-like interior, making it feel more like a sports car. The Mustang offers a smoother ride with a classic muscle car feel. Drivers debate which experience is better.

Better Seats for the Road Trip: Mustang or Camaro?

Ford

Long drives need comfortable seats, and the Mustang and Camaro offer different experiences. The Mustang’s seats are more spacious with better visibility, making road trips easier. The Camaro’s seats are sporty and supportive, but the low roof and smaller windows can feel tight. For comfort, many prefer the Mustang’s open feel.

Trunk Space Battle: Which Pony Car is More Practical?

Cars and Bids

Storage matters, even in muscle cars. The Mustang has a larger trunk and a wider opening, making it easier to load luggage. The Camaro’s trunk is smaller with a narrow opening, limiting space for bigger items. While both are built for performance, the Mustang is the more practical choice for cargo.

The Rear Seat Dilemma: Mustang or Camaro for Passengers?

Cars and Bids

Rear seats in pony cars are tight, but some are better than others. The Mustang offers slightly more legroom and easier access, making it the better choice for passengers. The Camaro’s rear seats feel cramped due to its low roof and small windows. Neither is ideal, but the Mustang wins for comfort.

Material Quality: Who Used the Better Build Materials?

GM

The Mustang and Camaro have improved their interiors over the years, but differences remain. The Mustang uses softer materials and a more refined layout, giving it a premium feel. The Camaro focuses on a sportier design but has more hard plastics. While both have stepped up quality, the Mustang feels more upscale.

Movie Star Cars: Bullitt Mustang vs. Transformers Bumblebee Camaro

Ford

The Mustang and Camaro have starred in Hollywood blockbusters, becoming legends on the big screen. The Bullitt Mustang, with its dark green paint and roaring V8, became iconic in Steve McQueen’s high-speed chase. The Bumblebee Camaro brought muscle car excitement to Transformers fans. Both are unforgettable, but which one is more legendary?

Which One Had the Better Ad Campaigns? Marketing Face-Off

IMDB

Ford and Chevy have battled not just on the road, but in advertising too. The Mustang’s ads focused on freedom, adventure, and classic American muscle. The Camaro’s marketing leaned into aggression, speed, and rebellion. Both created lasting impressions, but fans debate which campaign made the biggest impact over the years.

Muscle Car of the People: Which One Had a Bigger Fan Base?

BAT

The Mustang and Camaro both have loyal followings, but their fan bases differ. The Mustang has been in continuous production since 1964, building a massive global audience. The Camaro, despite its breaks in production, has die-hard supporters who love its aggressive style. Both cars have strong communities, but Mustang’s reach is wider.

Drag Racing Culture: Mustang Clubs vs. Camaro Clubs

BAT

Mustang and Camaro fans love racing. Mustang clubs bring big groups together for fun events. Camaro clubs focus on serious competition. Both sides work on their cars to go faster. The rivalry makes drag racing exciting, with drivers always trying to beat the other and set better times on the track.

Which One is the Favorite of Celebrities? Famous Owners

BAT

Many famous people own muscle cars. The Mustang has been driven by Steve McQueen and Jay Leno, known for its classic style. The Camaro is a favorite of Kevin Hart and Sylvester Stallone, who love its bold look. Both cars have star power, making them popular in Hollywood and beyond.

Who Owned the 1980s? Fox-Body vs. IROC-Z Popularity

BAT

The Fox-body Mustang and IROC-Z Camaro were two of the most popular cars of the 1980s. The Mustang was lightweight, quick, and easy to upgrade, making it a favorite for racers. The IROC-Z had bold styling and great handling. Both were icons, but fans still argue over which one ruled the decade.

Which Car Has More Street Cred? Mustang or Camaro?

BAT

The Mustang and Camaro both have strong street reputations. The Mustang is known for its long history, powerful engines, and wide fan base. The Camaro has a bold, aggressive style that gives it a tougher image. Both cars are respected, but fans still debate which one has the most street cred.

Video Game Icons: Mustang vs. Camaro in Racing Games

IGN

The Mustang and Camaro have been featured in many racing games over the years. The Mustang is a favorite in classics like Need for Speed and Gran Turismo, known for its speed and style. The Camaro brings raw power to games like Forza and Midnight Club. Both cars are gaming legends.

The Tuner Scene: Which Car is More Mod-Friendly?

Hot Rod

The Mustang and Camaro are both great for car mods. The Mustang has a huge selection of parts, making upgrades easy. The Camaro has strong engine power but can be harder to modify. Both cars can be tuned for better speed and style, keeping the debate going among car fans.

Car Show Kings: Which One Wins More Awards?

Hot Rod

The Mustang and Camaro both get attention at car shows. The Mustang is known for its classic models and unique designs. The Camaro stands out with bold styling and high-performance builds. Both have won many awards, but fans still debate which one is the real star of the show.

Which Car Holds Its Value Better? Resale Value Face-Off

GM

The Mustang and Camaro both have strong resale value, but the Mustang tends to hold its worth better over time. Its long production history and high demand keep prices steady. The Camaro can also retain value, especially special editions, but its resale varies more. Both are great investments for muscle car fans.

Reliability Wars: Mustang vs. Camaro in Long-Term Durability

GM

The Mustang and Camaro are built to last, but some hold up better over time. The Mustang is known for strong engines and fewer major issues. The Camaro is reliable too, but some models have had problems with electronics. Both can last with good care, keeping their rivalry going for years.

Which One is Cheaper to Maintain? Parts & Service Costs

Rich Mccoy

The Mustang and Camaro both need maintenance, but the Mustang is usually cheaper. Its parts are easy to find and cost less. The Camaro can be more expensive, especially for repairs on high-performance models. Both cars require care, but the Mustang is often the better option for keeping costs low.

Who Handles Better in Bad Weather? Traction & Stability Battle

GM

The Mustang and Camaro are built for speed, but handling in bad weather matters too. The Mustang has better visibility and a balanced weight distribution, making it easier to control. The Camaro has good traction but can feel harder to handle in rain or snow. Both need caution, but the Mustang wins here.

Electrification Wars: Will the Mustang Mach-E or an Electric Camaro Win?

Ford

Ford has already entered the electric market with the Mustang Mach-E, offering speed and practicality. Chevy has yet to release an electric Camaro, but rumors suggest one is coming. The Mach-E is popular, but Camaro fans hope for a true electric muscle car. The battle for the future is just beginning.

Collector’s Choice: Which Classic Models Fetch Higher Prices?

Hot Rod

Classic Mustang and Camaro models are highly valued by collectors. The Shelby GT500 and Boss 429 Mustangs often sell for top dollar. Rare Camaro models, like the COPO 427 and ZL1, also bring high prices. Both are sought after, but Mustangs generally have a stronger resale value over time.

Drag Strip or Road Course: Who is the True Performance King?

GM

The Mustang and Camaro shine in different areas. On the drag strip, the Mustang’s strong launches and straight-line speed give it an edge. On a road course, the Camaro’s low stance and sharp handling make it a contender. Both are built for performance, but the winner depends on the track.

Daily Driver Showdown: Camaro or Mustang for Everyday Use?

BAT

The Mustang and Camaro both work as daily drivers, but they offer different experiences. The Mustang has better visibility, a smoother ride, and more trunk space, making it more practical. The Camaro has a sportier feel but a tighter cabin and limited visibility. For everyday comfort, the Mustang is the better choice.

Pony Cars: Who Left the Bigger Mark on Automotive History?

Car and Driver

The Mustang and Camaro both have left lasting marks on automotive history. The Mustang, introduced in 1964, defined the pony car segment and became a symbol of American performance. The Camaro, launched in 1967, gave Chevy fans a rival that shaped muscle car culture. While both are legends, the Mustang’s earlier debut gives it a slight edge in legacy.

The Final Verdict: Which Pony Car Wins the Ultimate Showdown?

Ford

The Mustang and Camaro have both been around for a long time. The Mustang is loved for its classic look, while the Camaro has a bold design and strong performance. In the end, which car is better really depends on what you like more.

Source

The nineties were the bridge that connected the modern automotive era that we’ve got today and the past. There were so many advances during this decade, from V8 powered sport sedans to the rise of the luxury SUV. There are a lot of things that we take for granted these days but in the nineties these advances were massive breakthroughs. Join us as we look back at the 90s cars that changed the automotive industry.

Lincoln Navigator

Lincoln Navigator
Mecum

Lincoln deserves their flowers, because had it not been for the Navigator we would not have the massive yachts on wheels that we have today. The Navigator was the vehicle that saved the Lincoln brand and launched the “bling bling” era as we knew it. Few cars changed a decade like the Lincoln Navigator did.

Source

This Volkswagen Beetle hot rod was built under previous ownership and is powered by a Chevy V8 linked with a four-speed manual transmission and a quick-change rear end. The car utilizes a modified steel Beetle body mounted over a custom-fabricated and Z’d frame that is fitted with a drilled dropped front axle, rear ladder bars, four-wheel disc brakes, 15″ Weld wheels, and Mickey Thomspon tires. Additional details include tri-bar headlights, a rear-mounted fuel tank, electric door poppers, aluminum interior panels, lap belts for four occupants, bomber-style front bucket seats, and a 12-volt charging outlet. Acquired by the selling dealer in 2025, this Volkswagen Beetle hot rod is now offered at no reserve in Florida with a clean Pennsylvania title describing it as a 1971 Volkswagen Beetle.

The steel Beetle body was shaved, chopped, lengthened, painted metallic green, and mounted over a custom-fabricated and Zd frame with a driveshaft loop under prior ownership. Exterior details include a rear-mounted fuel tank, electronic door poppers, tri-bar headlights, and a windshield visor with “speed holes”.

The 15” Weld Racing wheels are mounted with Mickey Thompson Sportsman tires measuring 26×7.50” up front and 33×21.50” out back. The dropped front axle has been drilled and features a transverse leaf spring, rack-and-pinion steering, and shock absorbers, while the rear suspension has been fitted with ladder bars and adjustable coilovers. Stopping power is provided by four-wheel disc brakes.

Inside, a roll bar has been fitted along with bomber-style bucket seats with black vinyl bottom pads and lap belts. Matching seat pads and lap belts are mounted in the rear, and additional interior elements include aluminum door and dashboard panels, door pulls, and a 12-volt charging outlet.

Instrumentation includes a tachometer, a 160-mph speedometer, and gauges for oil pressure and coolant temperature. The digital odometer shows 38 miles, which is believed to be the distance traveled since completion of the build.

The Chevy V8 is believed to displace 350ci and is equipped with a chrome timing cover and valve covers, MSD ignition wires, and lake pipes. An oil change was performed in preparation for the sale.

Power is delivered to the rear wheels through a four-speed manual transmission and a quick-change rear end.

The car is titled in Pennsylvania, using the dashboard tag from a 1971 Volkswagen Beetle that has been riveted to the front door post.

This 1938 Ford Tudor “Humpback” sedan was built between 2005 and 2007. The steel body was repainted Cadillac White Diamond and Nissan Le Mans Sunset, and the interior was retrimmed to match with bucket seats, Dolphin gauges, an Ididit column, and power windows and door poppers. The car rides on a modified suspension with a Mustang II-style front end and a Ford 8″ rear end, and power comes from a 350ci V8 linked with a TH350 automatic. A four-core radiator, pusher fan, Edelbrock intake manifold, headers, and a dual exhaust system were also installed. Acquired by its current owner in 2017, this custom Humpback is now offered by the seller on behalf of its owner with service records, a car cover, and a clean California title.

The car retains a steel body and its original chassis according to the seller, and it was smoothed, chopped 3.5″ inches, and repainted Cadillac White Diamond and Nissan Le Mans Sunset. The doors are operated by poppers, the bumpers were sectioned, and the running boards were cut for the dual exhaust system on either side and have a welded rolled lip. The windshield wipers require repair.

The car rides on a modified suspension with a Mustang II-style front end with front disc brakes, and lowering blocks were utilized out back. The staggered Gennie steel wheels were painted Nissan Le Mans Sunset to match the body, and they have ’40-style trim rims and hubcaps.

The bucket seats were reupholstered to match the exterior, as were the door panels. Billet pedals and power window cranks were installed, and a Pioneer stereo is mounted in the overhead console.

The Billet Specialties wheel is mounted on an Ididit column, and the transmission is controlled by a concealed shifter. The 4,200 miles on the Dolphin Gauges cluster is believed to represent the mileage driven since completion of the build, and 500 were added by the current owner.

The 350ci V8 is topped by an Edelbrock intake manifold, carburetor, and air cleaner. The four-core radiator is cooled by a pusher fan, and block-hugging headers were installed. The battery was replaced in 2024.

The oil sump, driveshaft, and fuel tank were all painted to match the body. The TH350 automatic is linked to a Ford 8″ rear end, and Flowmaster mufflers were utilized for the dual exhaust system.

Itemized records and a summary are displayed in the gallery.

The car is titled as a 1938 Ford in California utilizing the British Columbia assigned VIN above.

This 1930 Ford Model A coupe was stored for an extended time before it was built into a hot rod between 2009 and 2017. Highlighting the build is a 401ci Nailhead V8 that is topped by an Offenhauser tri-power intake manifold with three two-barrel Rochester carburetors, and it is linked to a Ford 9″ axle through a T5 five-speed manual transmission. The steel body has a 3″ chop by Iversen Originals and was mounted on Speedway frame rails and painted green, and the car rides on a lowered suspension with American Racing Salt Flat wheels mounted over drums. The interior was redone with panels from Brookville and has a Pioneer sound system and Stewart Warner gauges as well as a tilt-out windshield. Acquired by the seller in 2019, this Model A hot rod is now offered with service records and a clean California title in the seller’s name.

The 401ci Nailhead V8 was rebuilt by Wholesale Automotive Machine with .030″-over pistons, a hydraulic camshaft from TA Performance Products, and Offenhauser finned valve covers from Speedway. The three Rochester carburetors are mounted on an Offenhauser intake manifold, and the seller states they were recently rebuilt, mounted on correct secondary baseplates, and fitted with progressive linkage. The headers are from Sanderson, and the aluminum radiator is a Champion unit.

The steel body was removed from its original frame and repairs were performed before it painted green and mounted on frame rails from Speedway. The 3 ” chop was done by Dave Iversen of Iversen Originals. The lights were replaced as part of the build and ’50 Pontiac blue-dot lenses were utilized, and the car has a tilt-out windshield, a fabric roof, and a windshield visor as well as a body-color grille surround with a stainless-steel insert.

The car rides on a drop front end with components from Speedway including hairpin radius rods, a Super Slide spring, and a polished Panhard bar, and Posies supplied the rear spring and shock mounts for the Ford 9″ axle that was sourced from ’69 Bronco. American Racing 15″ Salt Flat staggered wheels around mounted with Firestone tires, and the front drum brakes are from an F-100. The car also has a Vega-style manual steering box, and the brakes were flushed and adjusted recently.

Interior panels were sourced from Brookville, and the bench seat is trimmed in brown vinyl. Behind the seat is a hidden Pioneer CD stereo and speakers, and the under-dashboard heater was converted into a speaker box.

The steering wheel is mounted on column with an OTB gear finned drop. The Stewart Warner cluster indicates 5,500 miles, and the seller notes that less than 500 miles have been accrued since the build was completed.

The T5 five-speed manual utilizes an adapter kit from Bendtsen’s Transmission Center, and the Traction-Lok rear end has 3.50 gearing according to the seller. The ladder bars are chromed, and there are nicks on the frame. Touch-up paint is included.

The car is titled as a 1930 Ford in California using the serial number 2824613, which is stamped on the body number plate above.

Historical images are presented in the gallery along with build records.

This replica of a Ford Model A convertible was produced by Glassic Industries around 1967, and it has been modified with the installation of a Chevrolet 350ci V8 paired with a three-speed automatic transmission. The blue-over-white car is built on the frame and underpinnings of an International Scout 800A. Equipment includes a white convertible top, staggered-width 15″ wheels, front disc and rear drum brakes, an Edelbrock carburetor, exhaust headers, a roll bar, a B&M shifter, and lap belts. The current owner acquired the car in mid-2023 out of Maryland. This Model A replica is now offered on dealer consignment with a clean Nevada title that describes the car as a 1967 ASVE Ford.

Glassic Industries Inc of West Palm Beach, Florida, began production of its “Contemporary Reproduction” of the Ford Model A in 1966. The cars were built on the chassis and running gear of the International Scout 800A and featured fiberglass bodies. Approximately 300 Scout 152ci four-cylinder–powered examples were built through 1971, according to GlassicAnnex.org. Glassic powered its vehicles with Ford 302ci V8 engines beginning around 1972, and a company called Replicars Inc took over the business in 1975 and produced 302-powered examples through 1980.

The fiberglass bodywork of this replica has been repainted in metallic blue and features a white convertible top, a grille guard, a radiator-surround ornament, fenders, bright bumper-like sections, A-pillar-mounted side mirrors, and diamond-plate running boards as well as headlights, taillamps, and turn signals. The seller notes pitting on some of the brightwork.

Staggered-width 15″ wheels are mounted with 205/65 Sailun Atrezzo SH402 front tires and 295/50 Telstar Turbostar G/T rear rubber. Braking is provided by front discs and rear drums.

The cabin features a bench seat upholstered in white vinyl, which is carried over to the door panels and the dashboard. The interior also has a B&M shifter, lap belts, and a roll bar.

An A1C steering wheel sits ahead of a suite of AutoMeter gauges including a 120-mph speedometer. The five-digit odometer shows 7k miles, and true mileage is unknown.

The Chevrolet 350ci V8 was installed under prior ownership and is augmented by a single Edelbrock carburetor, flame-pattern rocker covers, an aftermarket camshaft, and tubular exhaust headers.

Power is sent to the rear wheels through a three-speed Turbo Hydramatic automatic transmission that was installed under previous ownership. Corrosion is noted on underbody components.

The serial number shown on the identification plate pictured above is in the range of other Glassic Model A–style replicas that are reported to have been built in 1967.

The Nevada title lists the car as a 1967 ASVE Ford.