Skip to main content

After the pops of the flashbulbs and after the gathered Chevrolet workers and managers returned to their stations on the hastily thrown together assembly line in a General Motors garage in Flint, Michigan, the very first production Corvette rolled out of the garage and into mystery. Some claimed it was destroyed, the natural aftermath of torture testing at the hands of GM engineers. Others believed it could have been restyled as a Motorama show car. But, as early Corvette restorer and researcher Corey Petersen claims to have proved, that VIN #001 car still exists and has made its way to his Utah garage in preparation for full documentation and restoration.

“I’ve been sniffing around for it for 15 to 20 years,” Petersen said. “It’s been a fun chase.”

In fact, Petersen said it wasn’t his intention to find, let alone buy, the car all along. Instead, he and fellow Corvette researcher John Amgwert simply set out to document the three pre-production Corvette prototypes and the first dozen or so Corvettes that Chevrolet built on the Flint assembly line. Every 1953 Corvette came equipped in the same configuration – six-cylinder engine, Powerglide automatic transmission, Polo White paint, Sportsman Red interior, and whitewall tires – but as with many other cars, the earliest production versions of the Corvette had minute differences from the rest, and Petersen and Amgwert wanted to know exactly how the Flint-built cars differed from the rest of the 1953 production cars built in St. Louis.

As Karl Ludvigsen wrote in “Corvette: America’s Star-Spangled Sports Car, 1953-1982,” Ed Cole and his staff at Chevrolet were under a tight deadline. Harlow Curtice, then the president of GM, wanted the Corvette in production in June of 1953, just a year after it was approved for production. That meant a number of changes had to be made on the fly, including the decision to build the production cars out of fiberglass rather than steel and the conversion of the garage located on Van Slyke Road in southwest Flint previously used for Chevrolet customer deliveries into an assembly line while the St. Louis plant was being readied for production.

While production did indeed commence on June 30, 1953, the rush to get underway meant the earliest cars differed from the later cars in a number of subtle ways. Most people point to the wheel covers – domed to begin with, but eventually replaced with the more recognizable knockoff style – and Petersen already knew of other differences like a change in the convertible top design and the switch from foot-operated to vacuum-operated windshield washers. “Some changes were made late in 1953, others in ’54, and that was largely due to the inventory stock,” he said. “They didn’t want to throw away what they had, so they used up the ’53 stuff until it was gone.”

1953 Corvette No. 001

1953 Corvette No. 001

1953 Corvette No. 001

1953 Corvette production in Flint

1953 Corvette production in Flint

1953 Corvette production in Flint

1953 Corvette production in Flint

1953 Corvette production in Flint

1953 Corvette production in Flint

Follow the Research

He’d also known that the first three cars off the assembly line that June 30 didn’t go directly to customers. In fact, of the first nine cars off the assembly line, only three left GM, and those three – serial numbers 004, 005, and 006 – went to members of the Du Pont family or to executives in the Du Pont organization. The rest all went out for further evaluation to GM or Chevrolet engineering departments. Petersen figured the work orders produced by the cars’ time in those engineering departments should shed some light on his research, so he started to collect all of the relevant work orders he could from GM’s Heritage Center. Fortunately, Petersen said, Jim Perkins had Art Armstrong gather as much Corvette documentation from throughout the company as possible “just to get the Corvette community off his back,” otherwise many of those materials would have remained inaccessible or lost.

While it had long been presumed that the first two production-line cars had been destroyed after their times in the engineering departments, Petersen discovered different fates for them in some work orders he only obtained a couple months ago. The second production car received a designation of 3951 and was ultimately used to test the viability of installing a V-8 engine instead of the Blue Flame six-cylinder engine. The first, VIN 001 received a designation of 3950 and set aside for a few different uses. It served as the go-to car for various GM executives who wanted to experience the new Corvette sports car; it was on hand when GM announced the 1954 Corvettes at the Greenbrier in White Sulphur Springs, West Virginia; and most significantly, Chevrolet let a whole battalion of GM engineers pick it apart to look for various deficiencies that had made it through the rushed development and production process.

In total, those engineers found 22 items to fix on 3950, according to the work orders that Petersen dug up. Those items ranged from minor rattles and adjustments to design improvements that Chevrolet would go on to implement on later production cars. Among the latter, three in particular stood out to Petersen: an order to make more room between the seat and the steering wheel by both lowering the seat 1-1/4 inches and by raising the steering column, an order to revise the fuel filler box and its hinge for better body clearance, and an order to cover the exposed rivets seen in the recessed license plate box.

Those three in particular stood out to him because he’d seen all three on a 1953 Corvette once before, and he knew exactly where that car rested.

Forgotten and Pushed Aside

Exactly where 3950, the first production Corvette, went after it left GM remains a mystery. According to the paperwork Petersen rounded up, the MSO on the car was not triggered by a dealer, as would be expected for a production car, but by the manufacturer, Chevrolet. As Petersen pointed out, GM employees had purchased other early Corvettes after their times with the engineering departments (VIN 002 went to Russ Sanders while VIN 008 went to designer Waino Hosko), so it’s likely another GM employee managed to buy VIN 001.

Rumors within the Corvette community had the car in the Cincinnati area sometime in the Seventies, but not even the most ardent of Corvette historians were able to gain an audience with the family that supposedly owned it.

Still, 1953 Corvettes are few and far between and thus generally well known to Corvette enthusiasts. Amgwert, along with other founders of the National Corvette Restorers Society, had already tracked down VIN 003 and sent it to Lloyd Miller’s shop in Tulsa, Oklahoma, for a full restoration. That restoration, in turn, led another 1953 Corvette owner to send his car to Miller’s shop. That car, however, came with a number of oddities that nobody could explain at the time, and the East Coast-based owner had made some noise about the car possibly being VIN 002, which drew Petersen’s attention.

He and Amgwert examined the car after it arrived in Miller’s shop, about 20 years ago, and couldn’t reconcile what they saw with any production 1953 Corvette. The floor under the driver’s seat had been cut out and lowered. The firewall had been notched at the steering column. It had the 1954-style fuel filler box and hinge. Woven fiberglass cloth covered what remained of the rivets they expected to find in the license plate box. Because those alterations didn’t make any sense at the time, Petersen figured the car was an anomaly, likely a later production car, and nearly forgot about it. Miller and the owner of the car nearly forgot about it too; shortly after the restoration began, the owner turned his attention to health issues within the family and de-prioritized the Corvette’s restoration. Miller pushed it to the back of his shop and the two lost touch.

Corvette floor section

Corvette fuel filler box

Corvette license plate box

The Corvette’s History Uncovered

With the work orders seemingly confirming that the car in Miller’s shop was 3950 all along, however, Petersen arranged for another viewing, during which he re-examined the lowered seat, the firewall notch, and the fuel filler box. He found a few other oddities undocumented in the work orders as well, including fabricated plugs in place of the exhaust openings in the tail panel. Unfortunately, because the car had been stripped of many of its parts and sat without a drivetrain for many years, he couldn’t confirm many of the other work orders that, for example, called for a bronze gear on the distributor drive or a revised tachometer cable.

He reached out to the owner, initially just to help “get the car moving along,” Petersen said. “The car deserves to be finished up, so let’s get to work on it and see if we can prove what it is.” His conversations with the owner eventually turned to buying the car and, with a title in hand, he retrieved the Corvette earlier this month.

With another 1953 Corvette restoration (VIN 087) under way and the Utah snow making it difficult to jockey cars around, Petersen said he hasn’t been able to more fully examine the car since bringing it home or even to lift the body off the frame to find the VIN stamped on the latter. However, while emptying out the parts stuffed in the Corvette’s trunk, he happened to look under one of the flaps on the bottom of one of the cardboard boxes and found a door jamb VIN plate with a serial number ending in 001. He also put together a presentation on the car for his local NCRS chapter, which has since been uploaded to YouTube.

Petersen’s plans call for a full restoration. “The car is plain and simply not for sale,” he said. “I think I’ve got one more restoration left in me, and I think I already have everything that I need to complete the reassembly and restoration. Restoring a car such as this, you have to think through what point in time you are going back to. Are you going to include all of the engineering changes? I think you have to. That’s one issue that has to be resolved before the restoration can be done.”

EX-52, the Waldorf Corvette

Is It the Oldest Corvette?

Should Petersen’s continuing research on the car absolutely verify the car’s status as the first production Corvette, it may also prove the car to be the oldest Corvette known to exist.

According to Amgwert’s research, Chevrolet assigned five engineering car numbers – 852, 853, 854, 855, and 856 – for the development of full-size operational pre-production Corvette prototypes but ultimately used just three. Car number 852 became EX-52, distinguished by tiny scoops on the tops of the front fenders, which went on to become the Motorama car shown to the public at the Waldorf Astoria Hotel in New York City. Car number 853 became EX-53, another Motorama car that primarily toured Canada. Car 856 went on to be used at the GM Proving Grounds.

EX-52, after its Motorama tour, was ordered to be stripped of its body, which was then sent out for a burn test. The chassis, meanwhile, went on to be stretched and placed under the Corvette Nomad concept car, which Corvette historians believe no longer exists.

Work orders directed EX-53’s body to be placed on 856’s chassis. The latter, after its time at the proving grounds, started to look shabby, and GM executives wanted it to look nicer for visiting dignitaries. The chassis of EX-53 and the body of 856 were ordered to be crushed, and neither the body of EX-53 or the chassis of 856 have surfaced in the years since. “This is still an ongoing research project,” Petersen said.

As for the naysayers who doubt Petersen’s research and claims about any of the pre-production or early production Corvettes, Petersen said he hopes that by bringing this particular car to light, it’ll spur others to offer further evidence for examination. “I get that this is a controversial subject,” he said. “But I welcome other points of view with documentation to back it up.”

He said he expects the restoration of the car to take four or five years.

The 1980s were a defining time for the muscle car business as the industry shifted away from the big block V8-powered cars of the 1960s and early 1970s. Cars were more economical and new emissions laws were putting a damper on what automakers got away with. Nevertheless, there were quite a few exciting muscle cars that came out in the 1980s. These cars were more advanced than anything that came before them, and although there was less power, the cars were still impressive.

Ford was instrumental in the 1980s muscle car scene with its Fox Body Mustang, one of the most iconic cars ever built. The 1980s are often frowned upon when it comes to reliability and performance, but in some ways, this was also the pinnacle of the new age of automotive design. But there were also a lot of lemons during this era. So we looked back at the muscle cars that should be avoided. Many of these vehicles became instant rust buckets that you don’t even see on the road anymore.

Photo Credit: Mecum

1980 Ford Mustang

The 1980 Mustang launched the car that we know today as the “Fox Body” Mustang. The major flaw with the 1980 Mustang was the lackluster four-cylinder engine. There was nothing “Muscular” about this pony car. The new generation of the Mustang was the smallest model ever to carry the Mustang badge. The original Mustang GT that came long before the 5.0 had the 4.9-liter Windsor V8 under the hood (via Motor Trend).

Photo Credit: Ford

The 5.0 was introduced a short while later, but the first year was crucial in introducing the fox body to the public. The original models had shoddy build quality compared to other vehicles at the time. It’s not uncommon to see an early fox-body Mustang in the junkyard, which is why enthusiasts try to skip these models. Although a fox-body Mustang is still a fox-body Mustang, you’ll want to steer clear of this one.

The post Save Your Money: 1980s Muscle Cars That Aren’t Worth Scrap Metal appeared first on Motor Junkie.

The Dodge Charger Daytona SRT EV concept car raised eyebrows when it was released to the public last year, mostly due to its imitation exhaust system dubbed the “Fratzonic Chambered Exhaust.” Typically, an exhaust doesn’t belong on a fully electric car, but Dodge decided they weren’t ready to lose the deep burbling sound that, supposedly, only a naturally aspirated V-8 can make.

The Fratzonic Chambered Exhaust system on the Daytona SRT EV can reach up to 126 decibels, the same as a Hellcat powered Dodge, by pushing air through a chambered speaker box and down the pipes, exiting via the exhaust outlet. Dodge wasn’t done tuning the sound upon the system’s first release, but it was certainly a conversation starter.

The latest version of the Fratzonic system was presented at the Chicago Auto Show’s Concept & Technology Garage. The sound still doesn’t completely encompass that of a true V-8, but the rumble and bass tone was definitely adjusted to be deeper and less electronic. But that’s just our opinion, what do you think? Take a listen and then comment below.


SRT Charger Dodge Electric Performance Muscle Coupe Daytona Concept

youtu.be

This Ford Tudor sedan is a steel-bodied hot rod commissioned by the current owner and completed by Gas Axe Garage in St. Johns, Michigan. The car features a chopped and pillarless roofline and is finished in brown metallic with hand-painted pinstripes. Power is provided by a 351ci Windsor V8 paired with a three-speed automatic transmission, and additional features include a Ford 9″ rear end, a Holley four-barrel carburetor, lake-style exhaust headers equipped with block-out plates, and hairpin radius rods along with front disc brakes and 16″ wheels. The interior has been modified with a Thunderbird-sourced dashboard, a tilting steering column, custom brown leather upholstery, Kenwood and Rockford Fosgate stereo components, and Classic Instruments gauges. This Ford hot rod is now offered on dealer consignment with a clean Michigan title that describes the vehicle as a 1930 Ford.

Finished in brown metallic with hand-painted pinstripes, the steel Tudor bodywork was modified with a roof chop and removal of the b-pillar to create a pillarless roofline. The headlights are positioned ahead of the grille, and additional features include shaved door hardware, a removable canvas roof top, shortened doors, and a frenched rear license plate surround and taillights. The car is not equipped with side windows.

Bronze-painted 16″ wheels are mounted with chrome covers and trim rings and are wrapped in Firestone wide-whitewall tires. The suspension features a dropped front axle with hairpin radius rods, transverse leaf springs, and tube shocks, while adjustable coilovers and ladder bars are fitted out back. Disc brakes with vented rotors are installed up front.

The interior is outfitted with bucket seats trimmed in brown leather with diamond-stitched inserts and accompanied by matching  treatments for the door panels and interior trim. The body-color dashboard is said to have been sourced from a Thunderbird model, and additional features include a floor-mounted shifter, banjo-style steering, and a lockable glovebox housing a Kenwood receiver linked to Rockford Fosgate components.

Classic Instruments gauges consist of a 100-mph speedometer flanked by a collection of auxiliary gauges. The six-digit odometer displays zero miles, with true mileage unknown.

The rear seats have been removed in favor of an upholstered enclosure housing the fuel cell and battery.

The 351ci Windsor V8 was reportedly built by Bonefied Customs of Lowell, Michigan, and is equipped an Edelbrock Performer intake manifold topped with a Holley four-barrel carburetor housed within a body-color air cleaner housing. Additional features include an electric cooling fan, MSD ignition components, Ford Motorsport valve covers, and lake-style headers are equipped with block-out caps and linked to a stainless-steel dual exhaust system.

The C4 three-speed automatic transmission sends power to the rear wheels through a Ford 9″ rear end housing a limited-slip differential. Additional photos of the underside, suspension, and brakes are included in the gallery below.

This Factory Five ’33 Hot Rod is a black-over-black example that utilizes a composite body over a steel chassis. The car is powered by a 6.2-liter LS3 V8 paired with a 4L65-E four-speed automatic transmission. Additional equipment includes a Moser Engineering 8.8″ rear axle, a limited-slip differential, Baer four-wheel disc brakes, Koni adjustable coilovers, and staggered-diameter Forgeline wheels in addition to a roll bar, electric windows, and electric power-assisted steering. The car was acquired by the seller as a kit and completed in 2016. This ’33 Hot Rod is now offered with a removable hardtop and a Nevada title in the seller’s name listing the vehicle as a 2016 Assembled Vehicle with 1933 as the model and a Specially Constructed brand.

The composite body is styled after a 1933 Ford, and it is finished in satin black with louvered aluminum engine side covers. Features include a removable hardtop, a hood bulge, rear-hinged doors, and dual side mirrors.

Staggered-width 18″ front and 19″ rear Forgeline wheels are finished in satin black with gloss black lips and wear 275/35 front and 305/30 rear Michelin Pilot Super Sport tires. Braking is handled by Baer calipers along with two-piece drilled and slotted rotors. The car is equipped with electric power steering, and the suspension system features adjustable Koni coilovers with inboard-mounted front units.

The cabin features bucket seats trimmed in black vinyl with matching door panels. Equipment includes a Vintage Air climate control system, a roll bar, electric windows, three-point seat belts, and a set of safety harnesses. An aluminum fuel tank and a battery box are mounted in the trunk.

A three-spoke steering wheel sits ahead of a black vinyl-wrapped dashboard housing AutoMeter instrumentation that includes a 120-mph speedometer, a tachometer, and supplementary displays. The digital odometer indicates 1,100 miles, all of which were added during current ownership.

The 6.2-liter LS3 V8 features an aluminum radiator, and a fabricated cold-air intake box sits beneath the louvered hood bulge. The seller reports the engine oil was changed at the 500-mile mark.

Power is sent to the rear wheels through a 4L65-E four-speed automatic transmission and a Moser limited-slip rear axle.

The car is titled in Nevada under the assigned VIN DMV55814NV.

The Pontiac Bonneville first appeared in 1957, with it being mainstreamed into the Pontiac lineup in 1959. That was the first year of the brand to exhibit General Manager Bunkie Knudsen’s efforts. Starting in 1964, a Brougham package became available for those who wished for something fancier. One of those cars, a 1967 Pontiac Bonneville Brougham four-door hardtop listed for sale on ClassicCars.com by a dealer in Pewaukee, Wisconsin, is our Pick of the Day. (Click the link to view the listing)

1967 Grand Prix front end

The full-sized Pontiac line was redesigned in 1967, now longer/lower/wider as was the trend of the time. The 1965-66 Pontiacs were athletic-looking and were a tough act to follow but, to contemporary eyes of the time, Pontiac may have pulled it off. Of special note was an interesting grille for the lower part of the front end that had multiple looks — the Catalina, Executive and Bonneville featured the trademark vertical headlights, while the Grand Prix hid its headlights behind the grille and featured unique parking lights.

Underneath the hood, the 389 was bored to 400ci, while the 421 was bored to 428ci. Tri-Power also was put to rest due to some strange edict that restricted multiple carburetion for the Corvette, but the Rochester Quadrajet was up to the task — Motor Trend magazine said that the top GTO was “the equivalent or better in performance” to its Tri-Powered predecessor.

The Brougham package for both the Bonneville two-door and four-door hardtops included Morrokide vinyl blended with Plaza bolster cloth and Princessa pattern cloth, Strato-bench front seat with center armrest., thick nylon-blend carpeting, power windows, door pulls, extra-thick foam seat padding, Carpathian elm burl woodgrain on the door panels and dashboard, electric clock and deluxe steering wheel.

Standard was a 333-horsepower 400ci backed by a three-speed manual on the column, which could also be had on the floor for a fee, as could a manual four-speed; opt for the automatic and horsepower was 325. A step-down option was a 265-horse 400 two-barrel, while two 428s (360 and 376 horsepower) were available as upgrades.

This 1967 Pontiac Bonneville Brougham four-door hardtop features what’s likely the most common combination for this car: 325-horse 400 backed by the TH400 automatic. Though the seller doesn’t give much in the way of description, the color looks like Plum Mist. Air conditioning is a fine addition to the option list, wouldn’t you say?

The seller is asking $19,995 for this plum-hued 1967 Pontiac Bonneville Brougham four-door hardtop. If you like the idea of a Pontiac that thinks it’s a Buick, look no further.

To view this listing on ClassicCars.com, see Pick of the Day.

The final day of Sick Week 2023 saw many battles for position come down to the final laps in Orlando. After hundreds of miles and nearly a hundred racers out of the fray, it was time for racers to put the wild tunes in and shoot for the moon. Showing restraint was no longer an option. And there were way too many battles that needed to be settled before the day was done and awards handed out.

With Tom Bailey having bowed out after Bradenton, Unlimited was a contest between Michael Westberg and Stefan Gustafsson. Both Swedes had been battling each other to within tenths of each other’s time slips. But it was the Corvette’s nasty wheel-hopping tendencies that allowed Westberg’s 6.435- second pass at 216 MPH to shut the door for good. Westberg’s 6.46 average trumped Gustafson’s second-place 6.59 average. But the victory was a touch bittersweet, as the S-10 had turned it’s last lap in anger. The rolling chassis had already been sold and the powertrain is moving on to Westberg’s next project.

In Unlimited Iron, Alex Taylor persevered throughout all of her doubts to clip four six-second laps. Day five wouldn’t see a full week with a six-second pass per track, but the 7.08 pass was close enough to be good. Tina Pierce would take second with her 1966 Nova, while Robert Bartram’s Mercury Cougar would collect third place.

Sick Week Day 5 Drag and Drive

Tina Pierce took home the #2 spot behind Alex Taylor In the Unlimited Iron class. Sick Week 2023 marked her third event with the Chevy II.Cole Reynolds

Brett LaSala’s “Snot Rocket 2.0” Mustang was a dominant force in Modified, also staying in the six-second average range. Pro Street saw Clark Rosenstengel wound up the victim of an upset when his driveline forced him into a 12.52-second final pass, which allowed Clint Sodowsky to earn the title with a 7.69 average. Super Street’s battle between Eric Yost, Bradley Arnold, and Andrew Dopita boiled down to a distance of eight hundredths between first-place Yost and third-place Dopita.

Stick Shift was Richard Guido’s class to lose, and his 8.84 average clenched it while Zackary Wicks took the Quickest Non-V8 Stick award with his 1997 Jeep TJ. “Doc” McEntire and his “See Red” Camaro sewed up Naturally Aspirated with seven-second laps every day. Rowdy Radial saw Jordan Tuck use Devin Vanderhoof’s Mustang as it was intended, averaging a 4.64 average in the 1/8th mile. In Street Freaks, Tony Niemczyk’s 1995 Eclipse claimed a second title and Quickest Four-Cylinder. Ben “Mechanical Stig” Neal took Quickest Six-Cylinder with his Barra-motivated 1987 Toyota Cresta, while Jessie Harris claimed Quickest Diesel with his Chevrolet C10.

Larry West’s 1941 Willys won the crown in Hot Rod vs. Gassers vs. Beetles, with James Holth claiming the Beetle title with his Karmann Ghia and Robert Leavens taking the Gasser win with his 1965 Chevy II. Street Race 275 saw William Lujan and Jordan Boudreau separated by one-thousandth of a second before day five and at the end as well, with Lujan the victor. Sick Street Race was just as tight, with Aaron Shaffer just barely clenching the win over Dustin Trance.

Sick Week Day 5 Drag and Drive Michael Westberg

Michael Westberg secured the overall and Unlimited class win at Sick Week 2023. The S-10 has been sold as a rolling chassis, but the engine combo will come out and go into a new car he is currently building.Cole Reynolds

Sick Week 2023 Winners:

  • Unlimited: Michael Westberg, 1991 Chevrolet S-10, 6.4640@214.416
  • Unlimited Iron: Alex Taylor, 1955 Chevrolet 210, 6.9866@206.946
  • Modified: Brett LaSala, 2012 Ford Mustang, 6.7438@213.444
  • Pro Street: Clark Rosenstengal, 2010 Chevrolet Camaro, 7.6976@183.796
  • Super Street: Eric Yost, 1968 Chevrolet Camaro, 7.4614@186.822
  • Stick Shift: Richard Guido, 1965 Pontiac GTO, 8.8452@160.488
  • Naturally Aspirated: James “Doc” McEntire, 1968 Chevrolet Camaro, 7.8338@163.742
  • Rowdy Radials (1/8th Mile): Jordan Tuck, 1993 Ford Mustang, 4.644@166.494
  • Sick Week Freaks: Tony Niemczyk, 1995 Mitsubishi Eclipse, 8.7606@154.892
  • Hot Rods vs. Gassers vs. Beetles: Larry West, 1941 Willys, 10.0334@132.342
  • Street Race 275: William Lujan, 1990 Ford Mustang, 8.5428@159.196
  • Sick Street Race: Aaron Shaffer, 1998 Chevrolet Camaro SS, 8.5428@159.196
  • Pro DYO: Nicholas Destine, 1983 Ford LTD. Fastest ET: 9.262 Slowest ET: 9.296 Spread: 0.034
  • DYO: Wilfredo Blanco, 2016 Ford Mustang GT. Fastest ET: 10.540 Slowest ET 10.586 Spread: 0.046

Sick Week Day 5 Drag and Drive

Sick Week Day 5 Drag and Drive

Sick Week Day 5 Drag and Drive

Sick Week Day 5 Drag and Drive

Sick Week Day 5 Drag and Drive

Sick Week Day 5 Drag and Drive

Sick Week 2023 Full Gallery: Day Five

At one point, Roberto F. Neris lost track of how many Chevettes he owned.

“I had to go count them again,” he said. “Not too many people have so many cars they lose track of them.”

For the record, he has 27 Chevrolet Chevettes, Pontiac T-1000s, and even a couple rarities like a Pontiac Acadian and a Buick Opel by Isuzu. Or, at least, he does as of this writing. In the time it took to schedule and conduct an interview with him, he added at least a couple to the collection, and he’s always on the prowl for more. “Almost anything Chevette related, I grab it,” he said. While he said he knows of some Canadians who may have more Chevettes by headcount, those cars are largely parts cars. He, on the other hand, figures he might have the largest collection of running, driving, and insured GM T-cars in North America.

“It is an obsession,” he said.

Why Chevettes?

Exactly why would anybody collect so many examples of perhaps the cheapest car GM ever built, the one car that seems destined to never increase in cachet no matter how old, the car that even malaise car enthusiasts look down upon? “I’ve had guys look at my whole collection and say, ‘Hey, you’ve got a couple hundred dollars’ worth of cars there,'” Rob said.

He’ll laugh at the jokes, but his reasoning is just as earnest as any other collector’s: His first car was a five-year-old 1984 Chevette that his father bought him when he turned 16 and got his license. His father didn’t have a lot of money, he said, “but he got the best car he could get me.”

That car took Rob to school and to his jobs as a pizza delivery guy and at the counter of a Pep Boys. He learned to wrench on it, and fondly recalls swapping in a 2.8L V-6 over a weekend when the original 1.6L four-cylinder blew up so he’d have a ride to school on Monday. “It wasn’t perfect, but it ran and drove,” he said.

That first car also survived plenty of young Rob’s abuse. Only after seven accidents did he have to send it to the junkyard. “That last one, I hit a telephone pole, a fireplug, and then a 1980 Olds Cutlass, and it ripped the whole front end off the car,” he said. “But we were okay, and I started it up and drove it home.”

He admits the cars had their faults. They were never great on power. The ergonomics of that angled steering column and the minimal footwells were uncomfortable. The brakes had a tendency to overheat, boiling the fluid and leading to crashes such as the one that took his 1984 out of commission. But they still held a certain charm for him.

“They’re such basic, simple, honest cars,” he said. “They’re so easy to work on, you can fix about anything with pliers and a screwdriver. In the Chevette commercials they said it’d ‘drive you happy’ and that’s true. Every time I get in one, I feel like I’m 16 again.”

And, even with recent upticks in prices, Chevettes are still the cheapest way to get into a rear-wheel-drive GM car.

Chevette collector

Chevette collector

Chevette collector

Chevette collector

Chevette collector

Chevette collector

Chevette collector

Chevette collector

Chevette collector

The Collection Begins

While Rob always had at least a couple on hand both before and after he crashed that first one, they were mainly parts cars that he could buy for $50 or $100 that he used to keep his daily drivers running. He kept them stashed at his parents’ house or in garages around Philadelphia until he eventually became a used car dealer and bought a 13,000-square-foot warehouse. But then in 2006 or 2007, he realized that the parts cars he was buying were so nice and original, he couldn’t bear to take them apart, so he started to keep them as-is and look for more in survivor condition.

“They’re still out there,” he said. “People called them throwaway cars, but there are people who like them. There was a sentimental value to them.”

For instance, one of his Chevettes came from a 90-year-old man who bought it as the last car he’d drive and treated it well. “He wanted it to go to a good home,” Rob said. “The cars are like puppies in that way – people want them to go to good homes.”

Rob promises exactly that. Not only does he refuse to cut up the cars he buys now or turn them into race cars, he said that even if he removes parts from the cars – for instance, to change out the wheels or to install more powerful engines – he’ll keep everything, down to the nuts and bolts, that he removes from the cars should he decide to return the car to its original specifications. “I don’t know if I’ll need it someday,” he said. “I don’t even throw emissions stuff out.”

While he said he searches online constantly for Chevettes and has started a couple of Facebook groups dedicated to the cars, he finds many of his cars via word of mouth. “People know to come to me when they see one for sale,” he said. He’s even started to become more selective regarding the ones he admits to the collection. He shies away from four-doors, for example, and he prefers the 1976 to 1979 models, with the 1983 and up models coming in second. “The ’80 to ’82s with those chrome bumpers I just don’t like.”

Chevette collector

Chevette collector

Chevette collector

V-6s and Other Restomods

As noted before, he’s not averse to modifying the Chevettes in his collection, but only to a certain extent. He can admire, for instance, the Bad Seed – the Chevette that Steve Magnante built for Hot Rod magazine with a 500-cu.in. Cadillac V-8 stuffed into it – but “that’s too much cutting for me,” he said.

Instead, he likes to personalize the Chevettes in his collection. “That’s the whole reason I have so many, is that I can leave some original and I can have some that are a little different,” he said.

He’s done a number of engine swaps, mainly on his later Chevettes, including small-block Chevrolet V-8s, LS V-8s, and 4.3L V-6s, and he has an ongoing Quad4 swap project. He’s found faults with many of them: 4.3s are too heavy (“Might as well install a 350.”), LS engines don’t fit as well as earlier small-blocks, and small-blocks require upgraded rear axles. However, he said the ideal engine to swap into a Chevette for anybody looking for more than the stock 65 horsepower is the 3.4L V-6 out of the 1993 to 1995 Camaro. It’s lightweight – the complete drivetrain with a 2004R weighs about 35 pounds more than the stock engine and transmission – it’s fairly well supported by the aftermarket, and it’s relatively inexpensive and readily available.

That said, even in stock form, maybe with a non-computerized carburetor swapped in for the later computer-controlled carburetor and a good tune, Rob said the Chevette can be a lot of fun.

“On my commute to my shop, you can only do 40 to 45 miles per hour, and I can drive that flat out,” he said. “My son has one now, and we can race ours on the street and not get in trouble because nobody but you knows you’re racing.”

Chevette collector

Chevette collector

Chevette collector

Chevette collector

Growing the Collection

While some single-model or single-make collectors like to seek out rarities and oddities to add a little flavor to their collections, Rob said he’s more interested in preserving them as daily drivers. He has no interest at all, for example, in obtaining a Leata Cabalero, the Chevette-based neoclassic built in Post Falls, Idaho, and the only reason he recently picked up one of the Chevette-based Duchess kit cars made to resemble an MG TD is because it came unassembled for $500. The rarest cars in his collection, he said, are the 1976 Pontiac Acadian – the Canadian version of the Chevette that has become thin on the ground north of the border and that is vanishingly rare in the United States – and a T-1000 that he bought out of Oklahoma loaded with just about every option a T-body could come with, including aluminum wheels, power steering, power brakes, air conditioning, a tilt steering column, and a sunroof.

That said, he’s not averse to adding overseas variants of the T-car to the collection. He already has the aforementioned 1979 Buick Opel by Isuzu, a 46,000-mile garage-kept car with a plaid interior and period-correct Ansen slot mags, and he said he’d like to eventually import at least a couple of Brazilian Chevettes, including a station wagon and pickup variant. “The T-car was developed as a world car, but this is the only country in the world where they’re not adored,” he said. “In Brazil, they love them and make reproduction parts for them. It’s probably because other countries had sporty versions of the Chevette. The sportiest we got was the S, which wasn’t much, but I think if we’d have gotten one, things would have changed.”

That said, he does see mounting appreciation for the Chevette here in the States. As an example, Rob pointed to the 1977 COPO Chevette with less than 5,000 miles that sold at Mecum’s Chattanooga auction last October for $16,500 and that subsequently sold on Bring a Trailer for $21,000. “Not everybody can afford a Camaro or a Corvette,” he said. “With Chevettes, you can get a pristine car for $4,500 to $6,500, and you get a turnkey car you can go to shows with.”

As for their nerd car image, Rob said they’re still seen that way, “but things have changed. “A lotta people had bad feelings about the cars, but they’ve come around. They’ve begun to appreciate the cars because they lasted the test of time when others haven’t.”

Regardless of the cars’ rise in value, Rob said none of his are for sale nor will they ever be. Aside from continuing to add to the collection, he said he does plan on restoring a couple of the cars already in the collection. All of them, he said, will go to his two sons.

Or, at least that’s the plan. He’s already filled his warehouse with T-cars, Fieros, a few Eighties Fords, and the odd Astro or Vega. He may just have to buy another one to keep the collection going.

“All I know is that I’m doing exactly what I wanted to do,” he said.

In the classic car world, numerous cars are landmark models that lots of auto fans covet. Cars like classic Ferraris, luxury Mercedes, and sporty Porsches are all over social media as they achieve high prices on the marketplace. However, what about the forgotten, underrated cars from that era that can provide you with the same levels of performance for far less money?

So today we’re going to look at a selection of classic 1960s cars that flew under the radar of many enthusiasts. These cars may not be as well-known as the true classics from this Golden Era of cars, but they have enough power and features to warrant a look for any car collector. Find out which models made the grade right here.

Photo Credit: GM

Pontiac Tempest

In the early ’60s, all major US carmakers introduced compact models. Chevrolet had the Corvair, Ford had the Falcon, and Pontiac presented the Tempest. The new Tempest had independent suspension at a time when all cars used live rear axles. Then it featured an economical four-cylinder engine which was a cut-down V8 when all competitors had six cylinders. The third thing is the most interesting and Tempest used a rear-mounted gearbox, the transaxle design, which was unheard of at the time. Today, only the most expensive Gran Turismo Coupes like Aston Martin or Ferrari use this system. In the ’60s, Pontiac was the only production model with this solution (via Hemmings).

Photo Credit: GM

The Tempest didn’t have a conventional drive shaft connecting the engine in the front with the transmission in the back. Instead, it used a torque tube with a cable inside. This layout gave the Tempest perfect handling and enough room for six passengers since there wasn’t any transmission tunnel in the cabin. Compared to the rest of the compact car field, the 1962 and 1963 Pontiac Tempest was from another planet. During its lifespan, Pontiac sold over 200,000, making this model a solid success. But in 1964, the company introduced the bigger and much more conventional Tempest. Despite its revolutionary mechanics, perfect driving dynamics, and even some motorsport success, the first-generation Tempest was soon forgotten. Today it is only remembered by diehard Pontiac fans. The Tempest is rare at car shows and the parts are scarce.

The post Diamonds In The Rough: The Most Underrated Cars Of The 1960s appeared first on Motor Junkie.