Skip to main content

mod@tech

Let’s be honest—there are a lot of SUVs out there. So many, in fact, that choosing the right one can be overwhelming. And while some rise to the top with outstanding value, performance, and reliability, others just don’t measure up. Whether it’s outdated tech, lackluster powertrains, or just poor value for the money, there are a few we simply wouldn’t recommend to anyone looking for a smart buy. Here’s a look at 11 SUVs we would skip, and exactly why they didn’t make our cut.

Jeep Compass

Chrysler

We’ve driven the Compass enough to know it’s not Jeep’s finest. It looks the part of a rugged SUV, but the capability doesn’t match the image. The engine is weak, the interior feels cheap in places, and it falls short on fuel efficiency. Even die-hard Jeep fans might find themselves frustrated by the lack of refinement here. For the same money, we’d go for a Mazda CX-5 or Hyundai Tucson—both are better-equipped and more enjoyable to drive.

Mitsubishi Outlander Sport

Mitsubishi

This one feels like it’s stuck in the past. While Mitsubishi gave it a few styling tweaks over the years, the engine, interior, and overall experience haven’t evolved much since 2011. It’s basic—too basic—and the ride is anything but smooth. We’ve tested better budget crossovers with far more comfort, features, and value. Unless you’re okay with sacrificing tech and performance just to save a few bucks, there are better options out there.

Ford EcoSport

Ford

We tried to like the EcoSport, we really did. But between the odd swing-out tailgate, cramped rear seat, and underpowered engine, it left us scratching our heads. It’s small enough for city driving, sure—but so are plenty of other compact SUVs that don’t feel like a compromise. Add in its bouncy ride and dated interior, and we just can’t recommend it when the competition is this fierce.

Chevrolet Trax (Pre-2024)

GM

The first-gen Trax always felt more like a placeholder than a serious contender. It was small, slow, and uninspired—inside and out. We’ve driven enough of them to know they’re better left in rental fleets. The newer models are a huge improvement, but anything pre-2024 just doesn’t deliver enough value to justify the purchase. If you’re shopping used, you’ll find far better vehicles in the same price range.

Dodge Journey

Dodge

This SUV was outdated long before it was discontinued. Even in its final model years, the Journey still used a 4-speed transmission—yes, you read that right. The tech was outdated, the ride quality was below average, and it felt like Dodge just gave up on updating it. We get that it was affordable, but even budget shoppers deserve better. It’s a hard no from us.

Nissan Rogue Sport

Nissan

We wanted to like this smaller version of the Rogue, but it just didn’t deliver. It’s underpowered, noisy, and the CVT makes driving feel like a chore. While it looks good on the outside, the performance is a letdown, and the interior isn’t all that roomy either. With so many better options in the compact crossover segment, this one just doesn’t make the cut for us.

Toyota C-HR

Toyota

We love Toyotas for their reliability—but the C-HR feels like it missed the memo on practicality. The bold design is fun, but it compromises rear visibility, cargo space, and headroom. And without the option for all-wheel drive, it limits its appeal in climates where that matters. We’d recommend the Corolla Cross instead—it delivers more function with the same Toyota dependability.

Buick Encore (First Gen)

Buick Encore
Buick

Buick aimed to offer a small, upscale SUV with the Encore, but the first-generation model didn’t quite stick the landing. The cabin feels tight, the powertrain lacks punch, and the overall experience doesn’t match the premium price. We found better quality and comfort in mainstream alternatives like the Honda HR-V or Kia Seltos. If you’re shopping Encore, we suggest going for a newer generation or skipping it altogether.

Land Rover Discovery Sport

Land Rover

It’s a Land Rover, so we expected more. The Discovery Sport looks great and promises capability—but what it delivers is unreliable electronics, frequent trips to the shop, and a resale value that drops like a rock. Luxury shouldn’t come with this much hassle. We’ve had our fair share of experiences with costly Land Rover repairs, and unless you’re leasing or have deep pockets, this one isn’t worth the stress.

Hyundai Kona EV (Pre-2024)

Hyundai

We give Hyundai credit for jumping into the EV game early, but the pre-2024 Kona EV left us underwhelmed. The ride is stiff, rear seating is cramped, and the tech already feels dated. While the range is decent, newer EVs in the same price bracket—like the Bolt EUV or Tesla Model Y—offer more bang for your buck. It’s not a bad EV, but it’s not a great one either.

Infiniti QX60 (2016-2020)

Infiniti

From the outside, the QX60 looks like a luxury SUV, but behind the wheel, it’s a dressed-up Pathfinder with a lackluster CVT and underwhelming handling. We found the interior materials didn’t quite match the premium price, and the tech was already behind the curve even when new. For the same money, you could be driving an Acura MDX or Lexus RX—both of which offer a far more rewarding experience.

Source

Let me start with this. If you want to get a brand-new Porsche 911 Turbo, it is going to cost you a minimum of $160,000 and will likely end up running somewhere north of $200K once you add fee options. If you doubt this, visit the Porsche website, “build” one and see how you do.

Besides the economic to your bank account, there is another reason to reconsider a new Porsche 911 Turbo as a car purchase: The newest version, to me, is both too big and not that attractive.

I honestly think the best-looking 911 Porsches of the modern era are the 997 Series cars. These Grant Larson-designed 911s are the perfect modern take on the classic 911 shape. Every subsequent design seems to have slowly erased the original design language, making the newer 911 cars appear almost “cartoonish” to my eyes.

Of all the 997-era 911 Porsches, my favorite is the Turbo. It is less ostentatious than the original 911 Turbo of the 1970s and ’80s but looks like it means business and has the performance to back that up.

Our Pick of the Day on ClassicCars.com is one of these end-of-an-era Porsche 911 cars, a 2011 Porsche 911 Turbo offered for sale in Flowery Branch, Georgia.

The selling dealer states this 911 Turbo has a completely stock exterior, interior, exhaust and catalytic converters. They go on to say it is currently running a Stage 3 tune from FVD (a very prestigious and respected German company) that provides a reliable 670 horsepower and a 0 to 62.5 time of 3.2 seconds.

This 911 Turbo is a lower-mileage car, having covered only 67,000 miles from new and, judging from the photos provided, it looks to be in excellent condition.

This is also a nicely optioned car equipped with many tasteful features without going overboard. These include a limited-slip rear differential, PDK transmission, heated and ventilated seats, heated steering wheel, bi-xenon headlights with the Porsche Dynamic Light System (PDLS), and a black full leather interior with the carbon interior package.

This 911 Turbo also seems to have a great service history backed up by documentation. No really major service items are listed, but a 2011 Porsche 911 Turbo with 67,000 miles should not need any major things repaired or replaced.

Just for a point of comparison, I went on the Porsche website and built a new 911 Turbo as close as possible to the specs of this one. The summary of my build had a price tag of $219,685. I have a better idea. Get this 997.2-era Porsche 911 Turbo for its $98,000 asking price and then take the extra $112K and get another Porsche (say, a classic 911) to go with it. Seems like a better deal to me.

Click here to view this Pick of the Day on ClassicCars.com

The automotive industry is undergoing a significant transformation, driven by rapid technological advances, shifting consumer preferences, and stringent environmental regulations. As we head towards 2025, manufacturers are making tough decisions to phase out certain models.

This wave of discontinuations is not just about retiring outdated designs; it’s about aligning with future trends in sustainability and innovation. Many beloved vehicles will bid farewell as companies streamline their offerings to focus on electric, hybrid, and more efficient models. This article delves into the reasons behind these changes and highlights the 30 vehicles set to be retired by 2025.

1. Ford Edge

Ford Edge 6286 7
Photo Credit: Ford

Ford’s decision to discontinue the Edge by 2025 reflects the broader industry trend towards electrification and innovative technologies. The midsize SUV has been a staple in Ford’s lineup, but with consumer preferences shifting towards electric vehicles (EVs), the demand for traditional internal combustion engines is waning. This strategic move allows Ford to reallocate resources towards developing their electric vehicle portfolio, including the popular Mustang Mach-E. The Edge’s departure showcases the brand’s commitment to sustainability and meeting regulatory requirements. Ford’s future now lies in adapting to these evolving market dynamics and consumer expectations.

Source

Whenever we review a new vehicle, the same questions usually arise: Who is the target customer? How will it perform? Does it live up to expectations? Things were a little different with the 2025 Toyota Crown Signia Limited as it raised questions such as What IS this? An SUV or a wagon? Over the course of a week, we learned what the Crown is on paper and in the real world.

A HYBRID IN MORE WAYS THAN ONE

If you go to the Toyota website and click on the Vehicles tab on the top right of the page, a menu with the various types that Toyota makes drops down on the left. You’ll find the Crown Signia under the Crossovers and SUVs section, where’s it categorized as a Hybrid EV. Unlike its Crown sedan sibling, the Crown Signia is available with only one powertrain: a 2.5-liter I4 combined with a Nickel-Metal Hydride battery pack, two electric motor-generators, and a rear-mounted electric motor that gives the Crown Signia all-wheel drive on demand. Net horsepower is 240 and processed by an electronically controlled Continuously Variable Transmission (ECVT). Under ideal circumstances, the Crown Signia Limited can deliver 39 mpg in the city, 37 on the highway, and 38 combined. A snapshot at 109.5 miles showed we were averaging 40.8 mpg.

Once you go to the Crown Signia’s dedicated page on Toyota’s website, you’ll see its highlights, features, and the things it can do, but nothing about what it is. Interestingly, a June 2024 press release on Toyota’s media site refers to the Crown Signia as being part of Toyota’s SUV lineup, making “an all-new statement for the modern crossover,” and having “the advantages that drivers love about crossover Sport Utility Vehicles.” It seems many companies use either “crossover” or “SUV” to identify their respective vehicles, but Toyota uses both.

Unofficially, it’s easy to see the Crown Signia as a wagon. After all, it is essentially the longroof version of the Crown, which Toyota clearly identifies as a sedan. Looking at it from the side, the Subaru Outback came to mind, although that vehicle is more clearly focused on and equipped for dirty outdoor adventures.

ONE OF TOYOTA’S MOST EXPENSIVE HYBRID CROSSOVERS
Prices for the 2025 Crown Signia start at $43,790, making it slightly cheaper than the $44,210 Grand Highlander Hybrid and within several thousand of the Highlander Hybrid’s $46,320 base MSRP. Go beyond those and you start getting into Toyota’s truck-based hybrid SUVs.

There are are only two trim levels available: XLE and Limited. According to the window sticker for our Storm-Cloud-over-Saddle-Tan Crown Signia Limited review vehicle, base price shows $47,990. For that, you receive such standard features as 21-inch dark gray wheels, a fixed panoramic glass roof with a power sunshade, heated and ventilated front seats, heated rear seats, and a 12.3-inch center touchscreen with wireless Apple CarPlay and Android Auto. Toyota added on the $1,865 Advanced Technology Package, $375 dash cam, $405 Preferred Accessory Package with carpet mats, and two other options to our test vehicle, which raised the as-tested price to $52,515 – that’s entry-level 2025 4Runner i-Force Max or 2025 Lexus RX Hybrid money.

FUNCTIONAL YET INFURIATING

There was a lot to like about the Crown Signia’s cabin. It felt completely modern with its 12.3-inch digital gauge cluster, rearview camera mirror, and large center touchscreen. The automatic settings for its climate control system and front seats made sure every drive was at the right temperature. Storing small items was easy and quick thanks to the vertical wireless charging slot, open cubbyhole, and generously sized dual cup holders. The heated second row offered plenty of headroom and legroom as well as a pair of dedicated HVAC vents. Both rows seemed more spacious when the shade for the panoramic roof was open. At the very back, the 24.8 cubic feet of cargo space was enough to fit a collapsed baby stroller and additional gear.

However, there were a few odd or downright enraging parts of the Crown Signia’s user experience. The first became apparent upon sliding into the driver’s seat. The steep rake to the windshield made the front row seem more intimate and shrink-wrapped, like a sports car’s cockpit. As we’ve already learned, the Crown Signia is a lot of things, but a sports car is not one of them. Then there were those techy screens. Configuring the gauge cluster to show a desired readout was annoyingly tedious, but doing that was a pleasure compared to the sporadic wireless Apple CarPlay. Whether it was used to run YouTube audio and Apple Maps at the same time or just the latter, CarPlay lost connection so often that it was nearly useless. If anyone at Apple happened to be listening on the other end, they received an earful of expletives.

NOT SURPRISING

Whether you think the Crown Signia is a crossover, SUV, or wagon, that doesn’t change the fact that it’s a hybrid built for practical commuting, not thrilling performance. It behaved as such: the steering was firm, with a noticeable weight to it, yet it never felt heavy. Output from the hybrid engine was satisfying (not aurally – the four-cylinder engine always sounded a bit gruff), but counteracted by a stiff, uncommunicative brake pedal.

Our Luke Lamendola also spent time in the 2025 Toyota Crown Signia Limited, so listen to his thoughts in the below video review.

Click above and watch our full video review on YouTube!

This video is sponsored by Legendary Car Protection. Car ownership today comes with high expectations and high risks. A well-designed Vehicle Service Contract not only protects your finances, but also ensures your vehicle receives the care it deserves – no matter how iconic, rare, or routine it may be. To explore tailored protection options for your specific vehicle, visit LegendaryCarProtection.com.

In a previous life, I sold Lexus vehicles. My choice was more about recession-era employment than the type of vehicle, but I imagine Lexus has always been a fine vehicle to sell—after all, it wasn’t too long ago that the brand made the Germans (and Americans) take notice and up their game. Now it appears that one of the brand’s bread-and-butter may be discontinued, a reflection of an aged generation combined with a changing market.

2005 IS SportCross from the Lexus brochure

The Lexus IS was the first of Lexus’ Bimmer 3-Series fighters. I myself never warmed up to it but, when I had an opportunity to drive one, I changed my tune. The SportCross, the shooting brake-esque that was available for 2002-05, was pretty cool, though not available with a manual transmission in the U.S.

2010 Lexus IS

The second-generation version, sold in the U.S. as the IS 250 and IS 350, featured the availability of AWD on IS 250 models (which also introduced a four-cylinder for the American market). Also available for several years were the IS C retractable hardtop coupe and the IS F, a nice BMW M3 competitor featuring a 5.0-liter V8 and 416 horsepower. These are the cars I’m most familiar with from my experience at the Lexus dealership. The tight rear seat and tepid performance with AWD were the biggest misgivings that I recall.

2014 Lexus IS

The third and current generation of the IS has been in production since the 2014 model year. Hasn’t seemed as long, right? Depending on the year, there has been an IS 200t (with a turbo-four), IS 250, IS 350, and IS 350h featuring a four-cylinder and an electric motor. The IS 500 F Sport Performance continued to use the 5.0-liter V8, now with 472 horsepower.

The market has changed a lot since 2014, and sedans (and coupes—don’t forget the RC spin-off) like this don’t sell as well as they used to. When this current generation debuted, Lexus sold over 51,000 in the U.S. for the calendar year. For 2024, it’s around 19,000 plus another 1,800 RC coupes, and sales so far for 2025 project the final tally will cut that by a third.

2015 Lexus RC

So when Car and Driver reported the announcement of the 2025 Lexus IS Ultimate Edition, the periodical couldn’t help but think this is a swan song to go out with a bang—in fact, when approached, a Lexus rep said the company “could not comment on future product plans,” though we’ve known that the RC was already on the chopping block. This special IS 500 model features the basic 472-horse V8 and will be available a white hue called Wind, with matte-black BBS wheels and red brake calipers. The cabin is finished in two-tone red, and all 500 built will be numbered on a plaque.

For all the misgivings about Lexus’ “spindle” grille and angular hallmarks all over, I feel the latest IS continues to wear it quite well. Unfortunately, it might be time to bid adieu to another RWD sedan/coupe in the marketplace for the moment.

Electric vehicles are no longer a niche market dominated by Tesla.
With innovation sweeping the automotive industry, many consumers are exploring alternatives
to the brand that once seemed untouchable. As competition within the EV market intensifies,
customers are discovering a plethora of options that cater to diverse preferences and needs.
This shift signifies a dynamic change in consumer behavior, driven by evolving technology,
design, and performance. In this article, we’ll delve into 20 exciting electric vehicles
that are capturing the attention of former Tesla enthusiasts and reshaping the landscape
of sustainable transportation.

Source

This ’32 Ford is a steel-bodied Tudor sedan that was built between 2014 and 2022. The body has a 2.5″ chop, bobbed rear fenders, reveal windows for the side panels on the hood, and Kandy Apple Red paintwork with Tangelo Pearl and Sunrise Pearl flames, and it rides on a leaf-spring suspension with a 4″ drop axle and hairpin radius rods up front as well as a triangulated four-link setup out back. Power comes from a 354ci Hemi V8 with a Hot Heads intake, a Holley carburetor, and coated headers, and the car has a three-speed automatic, a Ford 8″ rear end, four-wheel discs, and 16″ Rocket Racing wheels. The custom interior by Unique Upholstery features Stewart-Warner instrumentation, Mustang seats, a mahogany storage compartment, a sueded headliner, a roll bar, leather upholstery, German square-weave carpeting, and a Lokar shifter. Following completion of the build, the car was displayed at the 72nd Grand National Roadster Show and was awarded 2nd in the Altered Street Sedan class. This ’32 hot rod is now offered at no reserve on dealer consignment with a clean Arizona title listing the car as a 1932 Ford.

The selling dealer tells us the steel Tudor body has a 2.5″ chopped roofline, and the rear fenders were bobbed. The selling dealer adds that Kandy Shop Creations of Mesa, Arizona, completed the subsequent paintwork in House of Kolor Kandy Apple Red and Kandy Brandywine with House of Kolor Tangelo Pearl and Sunrise Pearl flames with PPG clearcoat to finish, while Ogden Chrome of Utah re-plated the chrome components. The car also has a high-mount fuel filler out back and frenched Corvette C2 taillights.

The side panels on the hood have reveal windows for the 354ci Hemi. A chrome spreader bar and a billet grille insert were utilized.

The car has leaf springs painted to match the body with a chrome 4″ drop axle and hairpin radius rods up front as well as a triangulated four-link setup out back. Four-wheel discs were utilized, and the fronts have Buick finned drum-style covers.

The Rocket Racing 16″ alloys are polished and mounted with staggered tires.

According to the owner, the seats were sourced from a Mustang and reupholstered with custom leather from Unique Upholstery. German square-weave carpets are bound to match the leather, and the custom mahogany console has controls and a Lokar shifter fitted. The headliner is sueded, and the roll bar is painted to match the body.

Stewart-Warner gauges are set in a matching panel, and the windshield tilts out. The ~95 miles on the Classic Instruments speedometer represents the distance driven since completion of the build.

The 354ci Hemi V8 has a Hot Heads intake painted to match the body and topped by a Holley carburetor. The headers are coated, and the valve covers are chromed.

Power is sent to the rear wheels through a three-speed automatic transmission and a Ford 8″ rear end.

The car is titled as a 1932 Ford Special Construction in Arizona using the assigned VIN above.

The Ferrari F80 stands as a monument to automotive artistry, merging cutting-edge design with performance expectations that leave enthusiasts breathless.
Crafted by the visionary Ferrari team, this supercar embodies the pinnacle of modern vehicle aesthetics and engineering prowess.
Its sleek lines and aggressive stance make it a masterpiece on wheels, capturing the essence of speed and elegance.
With a projected top speed that rivals the best in its class, the F80 promises to deliver a driving experience unlike any other.
Yet, despite its impressive specs, the sound it produces may not hit the high notes aficionados crave.

Source

The Chevrolet Corvette has etched its name in the annals of automotive history as an iconic symbol of American engineering and design. Since its debut in 1953, the Corvette has captivated enthusiasts with its sleek lines, powerful engines, and unmatched performance. This legendary sports car has inspired a competitive spirit, sparking innovation and pushing boundaries in both style and speed.

As we explore the rich legacy of this remarkable vehicle, we celebrate the models that not only defined the Corvette brand but also left an indelible mark on the world of automobiles. Join us as we take a thrilling journey through ten of the greatest Corvettes of all time.

Source

Not gonna lie—when I was a kid, there were few cars that were as desirable to me as a Pontiac GTO Judge. I don’t think I preferred one year over the other, as they all have their own strengths, but the original 1969 version is the one that was seared in my mind, what with the signature Carousel Red paint, rear spoiler, pop-art striping, standard Ram Air 400 engine, and blacked-out grilles.

Hidden headlights were optional for both regular GTOs and those with the Judge package.

However, thanks to the Internet, we are able to network with others and discuss topics that interest us, if not connect with those who know more than us. This is not new, of course, but knowledge has increased exponentially due to you and me being on this particular medium. So, would it surprise you to learn that blacked-out grilles were not a part of the Judge package but, rather, were dependent on ordering one of two available Ram Air engines?

Visit the Performance Years website (link provided below) for more images.

When I first heard of this several years ago from an a popular Pontiac forum, I thought it was absurd—why change the grille color for an engine option? I was not alone as a naysayer, as evidenced by this 2010 thread in the Ames Performance Years Pontiac forum. But read further and someone posted images from an assembly manual that specifies different part numbers for grilles from cars with the L74 and L67 engines, respectively known as the 400 Ram Air (aka Ram Air III) and Ram Air IV.

It appears that black grilles were only a Judge thing for 1970-71 but, for 1969, it’s clearly a Ram Air thing and not just a Judge thing.